for refusing to believe the Court wasn't in trump's pocket.

and the ruling doesn't affect those (and those also have orders to return employees in selected agencies too).

I heard something over the weekend about how there have been over 150 suits filed against the 45 administration so far!

So I guess every single individual employee has to sue to get their position back?

The earlier suits (like this one) were being tossed for "lack of standing" as those orgs couldn't "show harm to themselves" (as organizations).

a. Destroy the right wing media that is brainwashing 35 percent of low IQ Americans
b. arrest the billionaires that want to impose their ideology on the rest of us, seize their assets and deport any that are not native to the USA... put the rest in prison ( I'm sure we can find some illegal shit they are doing )
c. remove all conservatives from SCOTUS ( a reset of the court, fire all Trump appointed judges no matter what )
d. institute nationwide free and fair elections with hand counted mail in ballots ( no same day voting, give us 2 weeks or more to vote by mail)
e. arrest and put in prison one Donald J. Trump for being a Russian operative.

Maybe not even Congress. Maybe it should be a coalition of governors? I don't want to say elections because I don't want money involved so if there was any kind of election for a judge it would have to be merit based only and there would be no advertising allowed. I don't know. I just think that any president being able to stack the court is not a good idea. And right now there's too much of a chance that they could all die off at the same time or something...

At least let the American Bar Association and the top Constitutional scholars in the country prepare a list of qualified individuals, from which the President would have to choose one, instead of letting them just do random politically motivated picks.

that would fix everything. But we need the support of the 90 million eligible citizens who did not vote, who are being harmed by the outlaw rump regime, to do that.

I don't think the founders ever imagined that one state would have 10x the population of another state.

If Wyoming or Alaska get 2 senators, California should get close to 30, Texas and Florida would get more as well...

But their model was the House of Lords and the House of Commons, I believe... and the six year terms were meant for the Senators to not be influenced as much as the 2 year term of a Congressperson by the passions of the moment.

But, this has proven to be a flaw in our system.

is reversed and it is clear the USSC supports F47?

That's a fact!

Groups that represent plaintiffs but don't personally have skin in the game often have their cases dismissed for lack of standing. Knowing the biases of the current SCOTUS, it seems wiser to pursue cases in which individual federal employees, or groups of them, file the suit. Sounds like that's also happening - will be interesting to see what new loopholes SCOTUS can come up with to dismiss them.

This was a case on standing based on the concept that some non-profits did not have standing. Several states have brought another lawsuit and have another injunction in place. These states appear to have a better standing argument than the non-profit

Link to tweet

Told him I was anxious over the similarities I was noticing between what was beginning to happen here and what happened in Germany and Russia during WWII. He said he saw the similarities too but that "we should be okay, as long as the courts hold."

I get these most recent decisions were based on technical venue and standing issues, but it also appears to give tsf's administration very convenient delays so they can calculate even more strategies to evade carrying out lower courts rulings. Meanwhile people who were given no due process or a chance to prove their innocence suffer horrors. When "justices," care more about technicalities than possibly saving an innocent person's life, are they really just?

In my opinion I don't think the SC is holding the line against the worst of tsf's administration. I don't believe we are going to be okay. I don't have the answers on what if anything can be done about that, but hopefully, other much smarter people than me, are preparing alternate emergency plans, instead of counting on this SC to do the morally right thing.

This is Mitch McConnell's doing, HIS SCOTUS.

He willingly and knowingly set the stage for the destruction of the US Constitution.

Without McConnell, SCOTUS might still be right-leaning, but not this treasonous, perverse undermining of 250 years of constitutional law.