Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(165,192 posts)
Fri May 9, 2025, 03:11 PM May 2025

'Atrocious': Watchdogs panic that GOP plans 'nuclear option' for corporate giveaways

Source: Raw Story

May 9, 2025 12:14PM ET


Government watchdogs and Democratic lawmakers are sounding alarm over a Senate GOP plan to overrule the chamber's parliamentarian and repeal federal waivers that have allowed California to enact stricter pollution standards. But critics warned that the implications of the Republican plan, which the party's leadership is still discussing, are far-reaching and could enable the GOP to advance other unpopular elements of their pro-corporate, far-right agenda.

"If senators are willing to overrule the Senate parliamentarian and circumvent Senate rules on the filibuster for the Congressional Review Act, there is nothing to stop them from going nuclear over and over with policies that would harm Americans and destabilize our democracy," said Lisa Gilbert, co-president of the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, on Thursday. "This could happen with other CRA proposals or in the reconciliation process."

The CRA allows lawmakers to review and —with the support of a simple majority in both chambers of Congress — overturn federal rules within a limited timeframe. CRA resolutions of disapproval are not subject to the Senate's 60-vote filibuster, a relic of the Jim Crow era that Republicans have selectively defended or scrapped depending on whether they're in the majority.

Republicans want to use the filibuster-proof CRA to block California's Clean Air Act waivers, but the Senate parliamentarian—the chamber's unelected arbiter of Senate rules and procedures—has said the waivers don't qualify as rules subject to the CRA.

Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/senate-filibuster-2671924582/



California's special "waiver" is NOT a "Rule" that was drafted and published in the Federal Register as a "regulation" by the Executive Branch but was a provision option in the Clean Air Act itself. It could be rescinded but would have to go through the regular process in Congress.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Atrocious': Watchdogs panic that GOP plans 'nuclear option' for corporate giveaways (Original Post) BumRushDaShow May 2025 OP
Most people today have no idea why moniss May 2025 #1
I remember my very first trip to California BumRushDaShow May 2025 #2
Back in the early '60's I took my first trip moniss May 2025 #3
Here in Philly, we used to have the largest set of oil refineries on the east coast BumRushDaShow May 2025 #4
Knowing these insane wackos, they're probably contemplating using nuclear weapons on California. Montauk6 May 2025 #5
MaddowBlog-Republicans go 'nuclear' to help Trump nominees, invite Democratic backlash LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2025 #6

moniss

(8,619 posts)
1. Most people today have no idea why
Fri May 9, 2025, 05:38 PM
May 2025

California was given that permission in the first place. They didn't live through the horrendous smog and the special circumstances California faces.

BumRushDaShow

(165,192 posts)
2. I remember my very first trip to California
Fri May 9, 2025, 06:23 PM
May 2025

which was to L.A. and the first couple mornings there, I noticed it was "foggy" and figured - well this is by the ocean so... like the east coast - a "marine layer". But then I realized the "fog" was yellowish and then it finally connected!

The city sits up against and meanders through the hills/mountains and the general air flow is west to east. So those hills/mountains can and do block the air flow and just won't allow the smog to mix out.

moniss

(8,619 posts)
3. Back in the early '60's I took my first trip
Fri May 9, 2025, 06:44 PM
May 2025

to Milwaukee. From about 6 miles out you started to notice a different smell to the air and as you got another couple of miles you could look at the sky ahead of you and there was a long brown layer hanging in the sky and that's how you knew you were getting close to Milwaukee. It used to give us headaches. Some of it was transportation but much of it was unregulated industry. The smell was a combo of things and maybe the worst was the very large rendering plants and tanneries. So you had the smell of the dead animals as they were being hauled in, the smell of them cooking and then the acrid fumes from the tanneries who processed the hides. Mixed in with coal dust, chemicals from metal processing and the wind coming in off the lake that brought the smell of dead fish and the raw sewage overflow that got pumped into the lake.

BumRushDaShow

(165,192 posts)
4. Here in Philly, we used to have the largest set of oil refineries on the east coast
Fri May 9, 2025, 07:21 PM
May 2025

and any trip down to the sports stadiums and arenas required us to go right past them. That meant being forced to promptly roll the car windows up as fast as you could!! I felt for ANYONE who lived down there in South Philly across from that.



Most of the refineries down there are gone but there are some just outside the city in Chester, etc.

Montauk6

(9,299 posts)
5. Knowing these insane wackos, they're probably contemplating using nuclear weapons on California.
Fri May 9, 2025, 09:30 PM
May 2025

LetMyPeopleVote

(174,355 posts)
6. MaddowBlog-Republicans go 'nuclear' to help Trump nominees, invite Democratic backlash
Fri Sep 12, 2025, 07:09 PM
Sep 2025

GOP senators have now triggered the “nuclear option” three times (and counting) in the last eight years. The consequences are likely to matter.

Republicans go ‘nuclear’ to help Trump nominees, invite Democratic backlash

https://www.europesays.com/2406089/

For many on the left, the Senate Democratic minority simply hasn’t gone far enough to stand up to…

EUROPE SAYS (@europesays.bsky.social) 2025-09-12T14:30:57+00:00

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/republicans-go-nuclear-help-trump-nominees-invite-democratic-backlash-rcna230778

Senate GOP leaders have complained bitterly for months that Democrats have used unprecedented tactics to delay confirmation votes for many of the president’s nominees, including picks for lower-level offices. Those Republican complaints are rooted in fact, and Democratic leaders have largely conceded the point, arguing that Trump is a uniquely radical president; that his nominees tend to be uniquely unqualified; and so these picks require unique scrutiny, regardless of the traditional process.

On Thursday, the Senate GOP majority took a dramatic step to overhaul how the institution functions. NBC News reported:

Republicans triggered the ‘nuclear option’ to change the rules of the Senate on a party-line basis Thursday, a move that will allow them to speed up confirmation of President Donald Trump’s nominees for key executive branch positions. The vote was 53-45 to establish a new rule that allows the Senate to confirm an unlimited number of nominees en bloc, rather than process each one individually.


Ordinarily, changing the rules of the Senate involves a long and laborious process that requires bipartisan support. But the “nuclear option” expedites matters, as one party uses its majority to overrule the chair, set a new precedent and effectively establish a new rule.

Going forward, senators can now vote to confirm nominees (including sub-Cabinet picks and ambassadors, but not judicial nominations) as a group, which will naturally expedite the overall process. NBC News’ report added, “Republicans say they’ll allow their own senators to object to individual nominees in any given block, but the rule will strip away the power of the minority party to do the same thing.”.....

Which leads to the other angle worth keeping in mind: The Senate has become slow, stagnant, ineffective and sclerotic. Significant reforms are, by most measures, absolutely necessary.

Rewriting institutional rules is profoundly difficult in the chamber, but the more both parties see value in going “nuclear” and making changes quickly, the easier the path for reforms that would make the Senate a better, more efficient body.

The Democrats may eliminate the filibuster entirely when they take power.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Atrocious': Watchdogs pa...