Supreme Court lets DOGE access sensitive Social Security Administration information
Last edited Fri Jun 6, 2025, 05:24 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: CBS News
Updated on: June 6, 2025 / 4:44 PM EDT
Washington The Supreme Court on Friday cleared the way for the White House's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, to access sensitive information kept by the Social Security Administration while legal proceedings move forward. In an unsigned order, the high court agreed to temporarily lift an injunction issued by a federal district court in Maryland that limited DOGE's access to agency systems of records containing the personal information of millions of Americans. Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented.
"We conclude that, under the present circumstances, SSA may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work," the Supreme Court said in its decision. The emergency appeal to the Supreme Court was the first to land before the high court that directly involved DOGE, the initiative previously led by Elon Musk that aims to shrink the size of the federal government.
DOGE's sweeping efforts have sparked numerous lawsuits. Plaintiffs have argued that the task force has violated federal privacy law governing the government's collection and use of Americans' information kept by agencies. Jackson, joined by Sotomayor, said it's not clear that it is in the public's interest for the Social Security Administration to give DOGE staff access to Americans' data before it's been established that they are entitled to it and said the Supreme Court's decision creates "grave privacy risks for millions."
"The court grants a stay permitting the government to give unfettered data access to DOGE regardless despite its failure to show any need or any interest in complying with existing privacy safeguards, and all before we know for sure whether federal law countenances such access," she wrote. "The court is thereby, unfortunately, suggesting that what would be an extraordinary request for everyone else is nothing more than an ordinary day on the docket for this Administration."
Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-doge-social-security-administration-information/
Link to ORDER (PDF) - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a1063_6j37.pdf
SunSeeker
(57,539 posts)wnylib
(25,355 posts)elocs
(24,486 posts)LymphocyteLover
(9,361 posts)this fucking conservative SCOTUS is either clueless or evil
sinkingfeeling
(57,209 posts)FakeNoose
(40,163 posts)LymphocyteLover
(9,361 posts)FakeNoose
(40,163 posts)slightlv
(7,438 posts)chicoescuela
(2,644 posts)NewHendoLib
(61,578 posts)Baitball Blogger
(51,718 posts)Elon, care to pitch on?
Rebl2
(17,398 posts)elocs
(24,486 posts)IcyPeas
(24,853 posts)He.gets.whatever.he.wants.
He owns everybody. There is no red line. There is no last straw
He's a monster/mobster
And
Fuck the actual supreme court.
It isn't meant to be this way.
elocs
(24,486 posts)yellow dahlia
(4,541 posts)When it came across the Chyron, I started swearing up a storm. Fuck you SCOTUS! (Well actually - the traitorous six.)
And yes, I want to cry...for so many reasons.
dweller
(27,835 posts)Call off your goons
✌🏻
Irish_Dem
(79,782 posts)The US Congress and Courts are corrupt and work for the billionaires and our enemies.
They are part of the wrecking ball destroying our country.
elocs
(24,486 posts)WestMichRad
(2,927 posts)
have access to sensitive personnel data while courts decide whether or not they should be allowed to access these sensitive data.
Totally reasonable!
riversedge
(79,408 posts)IrishAfricanAmerican
(4,381 posts)Courts have overturned most of what they've attempted.
Puppyjive
(917 posts)They now have the keys to the kingdome. SS employees work very hard at keeping information private. I guess it's all out the door now. Getting access to health information is very concerning to me.
dickthegrouch
(4,297 posts)Supremely
Criminal
Republicans
Openly
Trashing
Universal
Moral
Standards
Deftly doesn't include the three liberal Justices who are doing their best to lay the groundwork for reversal of these atrocious decisions at some point in the future.
Pas-de-Calais
(10,252 posts)Dissenting opinions are the only sane individuals left on the highest? court!!
Truly with the votes allowing access are the first to be hacked the worst
Justice matters.
(9,389 posts)... while having a majority in the Senate ends up screwing the private data of millions upon millions of people.
Being 'timid' in order to appease fascists never worked.
annielion
(86 posts)The 6 conservatives on the supreme court are unforgivable traitorous thugs.
surfered
(11,510 posts)Last edited Fri Jun 6, 2025, 08:06 PM - Edit history (1)
LearnedHand
(5,241 posts)(Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) not HIPPA. But I totally agree with you. We need, and will never get, serious European-style data protection laws.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_Insurance_Portability_and_Accountability_Act
surfered
(11,510 posts)surfered
(11,510 posts)dickthegrouch
(4,297 posts)Anyone (worldwide, in theory) storing data on more than 50,000 California residents is subject to the CPRA.
quakerboy
(14,711 posts)Trump continues to get what he wants. No laws, rules, or regulations have siginficantly stopped him so far.
Iamscrewed
(486 posts)Burn this administration down.
vapor2
(3,751 posts)Haru
(55 posts)Can we pass a law that requires congressional approval to allow anyone to access our records ??
yellow dahlia
(4,541 posts)He has been focusing on Social Security.
k_buddy762
(638 posts)que no?
travelingthrulife
(4,463 posts)Irish_Dem
(79,782 posts)The corruption is rampant.
Hotler
(13,735 posts)Picaro
(2,333 posts)Supreme in what sense? They now just issue decisions that have no basis in law or logic.
They should be thinking about what happens to them when this goes off the rails.
Violence is imminent. The signs are there.
People are getting pissed off.
Eric Princes 100,000 man army wont be big enough (reference to another post).
Deminpenn
(17,297 posts)Now that their leader is gone and also feuding with Trump, the DOGE plants in the various departments can be effectively ignored. Vought is nominally in charge, but he's tied up with recission now and will be fighting that fight for awhile.
Jared Moskowitz (D-Fl) was on the Weeknight on MSNBC recently and said that everyone (in Congress) knows DOGE is dead.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,599 posts)There are several in Congress who have commented on this, but far, far from enough. DOGE wasn't there to be oversight - they were there to blow a firehose of shit to distract from the primary goal - access to the data.
SCOTUS just told them to freely keep what they have already exported for "code review".
Evolve Dammit
(21,498 posts)travelingthrulife
(4,463 posts)Otherwise people might drag them out of their cushy chairs to face real justice.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,599 posts)And anyone who ever applied for SSI/disability can add their physical/mental health records to the employment, income, bank, etc ones.
Toothpaste doesn't go back in the tube.
Now we wait to see what they're going to do with it (and when).
lonely bird
(2,768 posts)This is a fourth amendment issue. On top of the actual fact that DOGE was not, is not and, hopefully, never will be an actual department of the federal government.
They just shat on the Constitution.
Pesky1
(39 posts)o Citizen's United
o President immune from prosecution
o Malicious outsiders given complete access to SS data
Take a look at the Enabling Act of 1933 in Germany.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Enabling-Act
Opened the door to abject misery...which you would think CJ Roberts would know about following his massive education.
yorkster
(3,674 posts)of the Supreme Scourge Six is safely tucked away somewhere....