Trump dismisses Gabbard's testimony on Iran nukes: "I don't care what she said"
Source: Axios
6 hours ago
President Trump on Tuesday said Iran was "very close" to having a nuclear weapon, despite March testimony from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard that Tehran was not building one.
The big picture: His comments, which critics see as shirking his DNI's own assessment, came after he sent shockwaves through the Middle East with a Monday Truth Social post calling for the evacuation of Tehran.
Israel bombed Iran's nuclear and missile sites during a wave of attacks Thursday, from which the U.S. distanced itself. An IDF official claimed that in recent weeks, Israel had indications that Iran was racing for a nuclear bomb, Axios' Barak Ravid and Dave Lawler reported. Iran denies it is pursuing a nuclear weapon.
Driving the news: When pressed on Gabbard's assessment by reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump replied, "I don't care what she said. I think they were very close to having" a nuclear weapon.
Trump has repeatedly stressed the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran. Israel wants the administration's help by joining the war against Iran to destroy its nuclear program. Gabbard, during her opening remarks at a House Intelligence Committee hearing in late March, said that "[t]he IC continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme leader Khomeini has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003." She added, "We continue to monitor closely if Tehran decides to reauthorize its nuclear weapons program."
What they're saying: A senior intelligence official told Axios' Marc Caputo that Trump's statement does not conflict with Gabbard's testimony because he said the Iranians are "very close" to getting a nuclear weapon and she had said that Iran doesn't yet have one.
Read more: https://www.axios.com/2025/06/17/trump-gabbard-iran-nuclear-weapon-testimony
She has joined the Elise Stefanik "Reject Club".
Attilatheblond
(8,274 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(17,648 posts)Proof once more that anyone who disagrees with his highness and not showing the proper loyalty will be cast aside.
Buddyzbuddy
(2,111 posts)The Felon is throwing in with Nuttinyoohoo.
For now, cuz you know,
Taco, Taco Man, I wanna be... a Taco Man.
red dog 1
(32,488 posts)oasis
(53,345 posts)LudwigPastorius
(14,155 posts)AI slop
red dog 1
(32,488 posts)Buddyzbuddy
(2,111 posts)He would never notice the difference if they slipped the Taco version in. It would be funny and he would be ridiculed.
Cha
(316,717 posts)I don't care how they try to spin it.
Aristus
(71,641 posts)crying and eating a pint of ice cream right out of the carton.
Her best fella just kicked her to the curb and took back his pledge pin...
riversedge
(79,362 posts)SomewhereInTheMiddle
(607 posts)... whenever the IC conclusions differ from his preferred narrative, he ignores them. And he is not shy about letting the public understand he knows more about everything than they do.
Who are you gonna believe?
thought crime
(1,193 posts)She obviously needs a mentor, like Marco Rubio. When asked about Iran's nuclear development she should have strongly attacked Iran with a complete non-answer in the most serious tones that cherry picked superficial evidence of nothing, warning of Iran's threat in the near future, with maybe just weeks, or days before they decide to destroy New York or DC.
OldBaldy1701E
(10,163 posts)Can I use that same strategy when he tries to have me deported?