Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(165,662 posts)
Tue Jun 17, 2025, 04:42 PM Jun 2025

Trump dismisses Gabbard's testimony on Iran nukes: "I don't care what she said"

Source: Axios

6 hours ago


President Trump on Tuesday said Iran was "very close" to having a nuclear weapon, despite March testimony from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard that Tehran was not building one.

The big picture: His comments, which critics see as shirking his DNI's own assessment, came after he sent shockwaves through the Middle East with a Monday Truth Social post calling for the evacuation of Tehran.

  • Israel bombed Iran's nuclear and missile sites during a wave of attacks Thursday, from which the U.S. distanced itself.
  • An IDF official claimed that in recent weeks, Israel had indications that Iran was racing for a nuclear bomb, Axios' Barak Ravid and Dave Lawler reported. Iran denies it is pursuing a nuclear weapon.


  • Driving the news: When pressed on Gabbard's assessment by reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump replied, "I don't care what she said. I think they were very close to having" a nuclear weapon.

  • Trump has repeatedly stressed the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran. Israel wants the administration's help by joining the war against Iran to destroy its nuclear program.
  • Gabbard, during her opening remarks at a House Intelligence Committee hearing in late March, said that "[t]he IC continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme leader Khomeini has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003."
  • She added, "We continue to monitor closely if Tehran decides to reauthorize its nuclear weapons program."


  • What they're saying: A senior intelligence official told Axios' Marc Caputo that Trump's statement does not conflict with Gabbard's testimony because he said the Iranians are "very close" to getting a nuclear weapon and she had said that Iran doesn't yet have one.

    Read more: https://www.axios.com/2025/06/17/trump-gabbard-iran-nuclear-weapon-testimony



    She has joined the Elise Stefanik "Reject Club".
    14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
    Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
    Trump dismisses Gabbard's testimony on Iran nukes: "I don't care what she said" (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Jun 2025 OP
    Proof he knows his DNI is BOGUS Attilatheblond Jun 2025 #1
    Aanndd another one under the bus, thrown there by guess who? MarineCombatEngineer Jun 2025 #2
    Gabbard's statement supports Putin's narrative. Buddyzbuddy Jun 2025 #3
    Taco, Taco, Taco red dog 1 Jun 2025 #7
    Well done. TACO extravaganza!!! oasis Jun 2025 #8
    Ugh... LudwigPastorius Jun 2025 #9
    Actually, "Taco, Taco Man, I wanna be ..a Taco Man" would make a great parody song. (by Randy Rainbow perhaps?) red dog 1 Jun 2025 #10
    I agree. The Felon likes to dance to the original version. Buddyzbuddy Jun 2025 #11
    lol.. Gabbard got Scorched by Big Fucking Traitor boss. Cha Jun 2025 #4
    Cue Tulsi Gabbard sitting on the couch in her bathrobe and fuzzy slippers, Aristus Jun 2025 #5
    Gabbard was speaking for our Intel Committee Report. So-Trump does not believe the Intel Committee. riversedge Jun 2025 #6
    He never has ... SomewhereInTheMiddle Jun 2025 #12
    Tulsi taking her job seriously was a rookie mistake. thought crime Jun 2025 #13
    Awesome! OldBaldy1701E Jun 2025 #14

    MarineCombatEngineer

    (17,648 posts)
    2. Aanndd another one under the bus, thrown there by guess who?
    Tue Jun 17, 2025, 04:59 PM
    Jun 2025

    Proof once more that anyone who disagrees with his highness and not showing the proper loyalty will be cast aside.

    Buddyzbuddy

    (2,111 posts)
    3. Gabbard's statement supports Putin's narrative.
    Tue Jun 17, 2025, 05:13 PM
    Jun 2025

    The Felon is throwing in with Nuttinyoohoo.
    For now, cuz you know,

    Taco, Taco Man, I wanna be... a Taco Man.

    red dog 1

    (32,488 posts)
    10. Actually, "Taco, Taco Man, I wanna be ..a Taco Man" would make a great parody song. (by Randy Rainbow perhaps?)
    Tue Jun 17, 2025, 10:18 PM
    Jun 2025

    Buddyzbuddy

    (2,111 posts)
    11. I agree. The Felon likes to dance to the original version.
    Tue Jun 17, 2025, 11:24 PM
    Jun 2025

    He would never notice the difference if they slipped the Taco version in. It would be funny and he would be ridiculed.

    Cha

    (316,717 posts)
    4. lol.. Gabbard got Scorched by Big Fucking Traitor boss.
    Tue Jun 17, 2025, 05:13 PM
    Jun 2025

    I don't care how they try to spin it.

    Aristus

    (71,641 posts)
    5. Cue Tulsi Gabbard sitting on the couch in her bathrobe and fuzzy slippers,
    Tue Jun 17, 2025, 05:45 PM
    Jun 2025

    crying and eating a pint of ice cream right out of the carton.

    Her best fella just kicked her to the curb and took back his pledge pin...

    riversedge

    (79,362 posts)
    6. Gabbard was speaking for our Intel Committee Report. So-Trump does not believe the Intel Committee.
    Tue Jun 17, 2025, 06:10 PM
    Jun 2025
    12. He never has ...
    Wed Jun 18, 2025, 01:34 AM
    Jun 2025

    ... whenever the IC conclusions differ from his preferred narrative, he ignores them. And he is not shy about letting the public understand he knows more about everything than they do.

    Who are you gonna believe?

    thought crime

    (1,193 posts)
    13. Tulsi taking her job seriously was a rookie mistake.
    Wed Jun 18, 2025, 01:59 AM
    Jun 2025

    She obviously needs a mentor, like Marco Rubio. When asked about Iran's nuclear development she should have strongly attacked Iran with a complete non-answer in the most serious tones that cherry picked superficial evidence of nothing, warning of Iran's threat in the near future, with maybe just weeks, or days before they decide to destroy New York or DC.

    Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump dismisses Gabbard's...