Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(156,684 posts)
Fri Jul 4, 2025, 04:40 PM Jul 4

Republicans slammed online for celebrating children going hungry and millions losing Medicaid from Trump's bill

Source: The Independent

Friday 04 July 2025 12:39 EDT


Republicans have been slammed online for their exuberant celebrations over the passage of President Donald Trump’s signature domestic policy bill which will strip health insurance from millions and cut meals for some of America’s poorest children.

The GOP budget package, dubbed the “One Big, Beautiful Bill”, provides tax cuts for the wealthy while slashing benefits through Medicaid and the food assistance program SNAP. It passed by a thin 218-214 margin Thursday in the House of Representatives and will be signed into law by the President in the Oval Office at 4pm Friday.

After the bill passed, Republicans danced in the House to Village People’s Y.M.C.A, one of the President’s preferred rally songs, hugged each other and posed for photographs with thumbs up. Others took their celebrations online. Republican Rep. Derrick Van Orden, of Wisconsin, replied “YES!” on X in response to a post which read: “17 million people just lost health care. 18 million kids just lost school meals. 3 million Americans just lost food assistance.”

According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, at least 17 million Americans are estimated to lose health coverage, or subsidies in their insurance that make it affordable. Fewer children will be automatically eligible for free school meals under the legislation and the bill creates “a domino effect” that will harm children across the U.S., the School Nutrition Association warned. SNAP benefits will now be withheld from adults with children who do not return to work if their youngest child is 14 years or older.

Read more: https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/republicans-celebrate-trump-spending-bill-b2782865.html

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Irish_Dem

(72,343 posts)
2. Making themselves and billionaires richer.
Fri Jul 4, 2025, 04:56 PM
Jul 4

By killing Americans in a cruel fashion.

These people are reprehensible.

DENVERPOPS

(13,003 posts)
11. Reality is on display
Sat Jul 5, 2025, 02:08 PM
Jul 5

that they could give a shit less about children and grand children, including their own.

Self absorbed Psychopaths and Sadistical sub-human pieces of excrement........

kerouac2

(1,208 posts)
3. They. Don't. Care.
Fri Jul 4, 2025, 05:00 PM
Jul 4

Period.
And some of them will never lose an election no matter what and no matter how fair the election is because they will get more votes than any dem.

progree

(12,093 posts)
6. But Social Security Admin says the "One Big, Beautiful Bill" will be great for older Americans
Fri Jul 4, 2025, 07:13 PM
Jul 4

according to an email from Krasnov's Social Security Administration that I got today --

Social Security Applauds Passage of Legislation Providing Historic Tax Relief for Seniors

The Social Security Administration (SSA) is celebrating the passage of the One Big, Beautiful Bill, a landmark piece of legislation that delivers long-awaited tax relief to millions of older Americans.

The bill ensures that nearly 90% of Social Security beneficiaries will no longer pay federal income taxes on their benefits, providing meaningful and immediate relief to seniors who have spent a lifetime contributing to our nation's economy. ((So there is a phase-out or max limit on income somewhere, I wish I knew what it was -Progree))

This is a historic step forward for America’s seniors,” said Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano. “For nearly 90 years, Social Security has been a cornerstone of economic security for older Americans. By significantly reducing the tax burden on benefits, this legislation reaffirms President Trump’s promise to protect Social Security and helps ensure that seniors can better enjoy the retirement they’ve earned." ((it doesn't help at all, it just cynically kicks the can down the road a little ways -- see below -Progree))

The new law includes a provision that eliminates federal income taxes on Social Security benefits for most beneficiaries, providing relief to individuals and couples ((temporary relief, followed by a cut to benefits sooner -Progree)). Additionally, it provides an enhanced deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and older, ensuring that retirees can keep more of what they have earned. ((Not a word about a phase-out beginning at 75k MAGI for singles that I've read about elsewhere. And see below my question on whether this comes out of the SS system too - Progree))

Social Security remains committed to providing timely, accurate information to the public and will continue working closely with federal partners to ensure beneficiaries understand how this legislation may affect them.
((Well you failed miserably with this lying piece of shit email --Progree))

All emphasis in the above is mine. As is everything enclosed in double parenthesis with a "-Progree" at the end

==================================================================

Though taxation of Social Security benefits sucks, and I'm glad they are reducing it, but realize that income taxes paid on Social Security benefits goes into the SS system, not the general fund. https://democraticunderground.com/10143282920#post4
So reducing taxes on SS benefits, however wonderfully progressive it may seem, will cause the SS Trust Fund to be depleted sooner. And unless Congress acts, the depletion will result in an automatic cut in SS benefits to where benefits match SS payroll tax income. But of course that's not in the giddy bubbly rah rah historic milestone for Trump letter.

I don't know where the funds for the "Additionally, it provides an enhanced deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and older" comes from -- from SS system? Then that will deplete the SS Trust Fund sooner, leading to benefit cuts sooner. Even if from the general fund, that still will result in higher interest costs on the federal debt because it increases the federal debt

progree

(12,093 posts)
7. Social Security Administration sends misleading email lauding Trump's new tax cuts law - NBC, 7/4/25
Fri Jul 4, 2025, 08:35 PM
Jul 4
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/social-security-administration-sends-misleading-email-lauding-trump-s-new-tax-cuts-law/ar-AA1HZP87

But it does not eliminate federal taxes on Social Security. Budget reconciliation, the arcane process Senate Republicans used to pass the bill while avoiding a Democratic filibuster, does not allow changes to be made to Social Security.

The Trump package does, however, include a temporary tax deduction of up to $6,000 for seniors, ages 65 and older, and $12,000 for married seniors. Trump’s Council of Economic Advisers argued last month that nearly nine in 10 seniors would not pay any federal taxes on their Social Security benefits because the new deduction would eliminate their tax burden.

“Under the One Big Beautiful Bill, 51.4 million seniors — 88% of all seniors receiving Social Security income — will pay no tax on their Social Security,” the council wrote.

Trump, who promised on the campaign trail in 2024 he would kill taxes on Social Security, has been repeating the false claim the legislation does just that. He made the claim at a rally in Iowa on Thursday night and at Friday's bill-signing ceremony.


So, it still effectively eliminates taxes on SS benefits for 88% of seniors thru the $6,000/$12,000 deduction, ACCORDING TO TRUMP'S COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS (there is a MAGI phaseout not mentioned in the article or the SSA letter), but this deduction is NOT ADDITIONAL to a direct income tax cut on SS benefits, contrary to what the SSA letter states.

The Council of Economic Advisers always is a part of the current administration chosen by the current administration. It is not a federal agency of mostly career bureaucrats or anything like that. It is nakedly partisan and doesn't pretend to be otherwise. So there is an element of dubiousity in this.

Former SSA officials and congressional Democrats said they were appalled by what they viewed as a highly political email being sent to Americans by a federal agency.


It may be a first for SS Admin, but its not the first by the federal government. I remember the Treasury Dept snail-mailing everyone touting the $300 G.W. Bush refund back in 2001 ($300 singles, $500 single parents, and $600 married couples) -- Google "GW Bush $300 tax refund in 2001".

I don't remember the wording anymore, but it was definitely laudatory. (lavatory?)

progree

(12,093 posts)
8. Trump Claims Bill 'Eliminates' Taxes On Social Security -- Here's Why That's False - Forbes
Fri Jul 4, 2025, 09:23 PM
Jul 4
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/news/trump-claims-bill-eliminates-taxes-on-social-security-here-s-why-that-s-false/ar-AA1HZAIH

How Does The Senior Tax Credit In Trump’s Bill Work?
The tax credit in Trump’s policy bill applies specifically to taxpayers who turned 65 during that tax year or are older, and who have a Social Security number. Those taxpayers are given a $6,000 tax credit per year through 2028 if they make $75,000 or less after other tax deductions, or $150,000 in the case of married couples filing jointly. For those earning more than $75,000 annually, the $6,000 tax credit goes down by 6% of whatever the taxpayer earns above $75,000, or $150,000 filing jointly. That means if someone earns $100,000 after other deductions, for instance, they would subtract 6% of $25,000 ($1,500) from their $6,000 tax credit. That math means no one who earns more than $175,000 annually, or $250,000 filing jointly, will receive the deduction.

Can Trump Still Get Rid Of Taxes On Social Security Payments?
Trump has promised to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits since before the election, but in order to do so he would have to get 60 votes in the Senate, which is unlikely given Republicans’ narrow majority. Trump’s proposal to eliminate Social Security taxes has been controversial, as experts predict it would make Social Security run out of money faster. The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) projected in 2024 that exempting taxes on benefits would result in Social Security and Medicare receiving $1.6 trillion less in revenue between 2026 and 2035 than if the current rules stayed in place. That would cause Social Security to become insolvent in 2032, followed by Medicare in 2030—one and six years sooner than currently projected, respectively.

How Will Trump’s Policy Bill Impact Social Security?
The spending bill’s provisions will still speed up Social Security’s insolvency, the CRFB projects, even though it doesn’t affect Social Security directly. The legislation will make Social Security and Medicare run out of money in 2032, one year sooner than had previously been projected, the CRFB predicts, based on other tax cuts in the bill that reduce the amount of revenue that’s used to fund Social Security and Medicare.


As I understand it, the $6,000/$12,000 tax credit doesn't come out of the SS system, but will raise the federal debt, and interest on the federal debt..

But many other provisions in the Big Ugly Bill ... well dammit, I don't understand. I was thinking that some provisions in the BUB reduce income subject to payroll taxes (payroll taxes go into SS and Medicare), but I don't know what those are. A simple tax break does not reduce payroll taxes. Later: the BUB reduces / eliminates income taxes on tips and overtime, and maybe payroll taxes on those too? But that would affect SS, so how is that allowed based on what this and previous articles have said.

The article talks about the $6,000/$12,000 tax CREDIT. I thought it was a tax DEDUCTION, a very different animal. The SSA email in #6 says an "enhanced deduction", and the NBC article in #7 says "deduction". Now I'm really f'ing confused, so I'll just stop here. Its like I'm trying to make sense of emails and articles that were probably written in large part by AI, and don't clarify, but their job is just to write some blah blah that gets clicks.

While I'm at it -- if it is a deduction, is it an "above the line" deduction, i.e. you still get to deduct it and it will reduce your taxable income and taxes, even if you don't itemize deductions, i.e. even if you take the standard deduction?

Or is it like a regular deduction that, along with other regular deductions, must in total exceed the standard deduction threshold in order to benefit you taxwise (otherwise you are just better off taking the standard deduction as 90% IIRC of filers do).

If it's a tax credit, is it what they call "refundable", meaning that even if your income tax overall is zero or gets reduced to zero by the credit, you still get the remaining credit mailed to you as a check or deposit, i.e. like a negative income tax.).

Or non-refundable, meaning if your overall income tax is zero or get reduced to zero by the credit, then that's it, you get no further benefit from it.

progree

(12,093 posts)
10. And here's one from GoBankingRates saying it is a $4,000 deduction
Sat Jul 5, 2025, 08:18 AM
Jul 5

a "boost" to the standard deduction for seniors (65+) -- Progree says if so, that's good, it's essentially an "above the line" deduction -- one doesn't have to itemize deductions -- and have the itemized deduction total exceed the standard deduction -- in order for it to do any good.

citing CBS on the $4,000 (see "CBS link" below).

GoBankingRates article (dated 7/5/25) :
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/retirement/trump-s-social-security-tax-u-turn-what-retirees-need-to-know-now/ar-AA1I17sW

Says even the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities ((a progressive think tank -Progree)) says eliminating income taxes on SS benefits would be unwise, costing the SS program too much, bringing forward its depletion date

CBS link: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/social-security-income-tax-benefits-trump-one-big-beautiful-bill/
Oh, JFC, this CBS article is from May 22, before the Senate came up with its own version that ultimately the House approved July 3 and tRump signed, so its worthless, sorry, damn it. Another example of AI written garbage.from GoBankingRates (the GoBankingRates article is dated 7/5/25, so they have no excuse whatsoever).

=============================================================
Does the deduction if that's what it is, come out of the Social Security system (leading to earlier depletion of the trust fund) is still my question.

DSandra

(1,626 posts)
12. Republicans should just come out and say that their lord and master is really Satan the Devil
Sat Jul 5, 2025, 06:11 PM
Jul 5

But of course they are conartists and master liars.

Can you believe it though? Such ghouls fantasize about seeing innocent, vulnerable people suffer and crying, and get all giddy about it! They are successors of the evil spirits in America that were responsible for Southern Slavery and the Native American Genocide.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Republicans slammed onlin...