If it is alleged that he suffered from PTSD due to his earlier car dragging incident, then he should have been placed on disability leave and not have been deployed in any dangerous field enforcement actions such as the one resulting in his use of deadly force.

if anybody with some power tries to hold him responsible.

My guess is he has serious anger issues, along with most of those ICE Capades Jerks. Did you see the video of two other ICE asses on the street after the murder? They were carrying on like their team scored a goal. Disgusting people.

Oh the misery which this agent has caused.

n/t

I said yesterday that he looked like he was chomping at the bit. He really was.

- he shouldn't have been put in a position where something like that might happen.

Was there any downtime? Evaluation? Normal HR stuff whether it’s law enforcement or not.

I wonder what injuries he received from these incidents? Probably none.

Munoz-Guatemala put the vehicle in drive and accelerated onto the curb, the charges said. Ross was dragged alongside the vehicle and twice fired his Taser as Munoz-Guatemala weaved back and forth “in an apparent attempt to shake” him from the car. About 300 feet down the road, Munoz-Guatemala re-entered the street and the force knocked the officer from the car.
The agent required 20 stitches for a deep cut in his right arm and another 13 stitches in his left hand, according to court documents. A jury convicted Munoz-Guatemala of assaulting a federal officer in December.

His last two shots seemed like they were just for the fun of it. IMO.

Unless he is a professional agitator?

Ain't it just about motherfuckin time?

Fuck him!! all the way to prison.

Mostly they're, in my inferencing, trying to say either he has a history of unnecessary confrontation because he's an a-hole that puts himself at risk; or he's mentally ill, and you know, if you're not quite right you really shouldn't be allowed in public if you're (R) and (ICE).

I suspect my measurement of the media unit's spin number depends rather on the context I found it in. But sympathetic? Puh-lease.

None are sympathetic; it's just "here's a thing ... find the appropriate reason to blame him, he's bad for a reason and any of these numerous options will prove guilt."

Give it 24 hours. Every news outlet is going to be trying to track down information on this guy.

Hey, that's what he gets and it's all legal. Perhaps some of his buddies will start wondering if this is all worth it.

Of course, they're probably all planning to leave the country and live somewhere else once the ICE raids are done anyway. You know, assholes who want a quick buck and don't care about anyone but themselves?

Rittenhouse & Ross Private Security. It could be Trump's next new investment scam.

"Let’s talk about something. The fact that the ICE agent who murdered Renee Good was dragged by a moving vehicle in a prior incident is not a defense, it actually makes the situation much worse for him. In law-enforcement reviews, a previous similar incident doesn’t excuse later conduct; it establishes that the risk was known and that the officer had already been warned, reviewed, and retrained. Instead of supporting his justification, it raises the standard of care he was expected to follow.
ICE agents, like all federal law-enforcement officers, are trained not to place themselves in front of or alongside moving vehicles. Vehicles are treated as inherently dangerous, and standard training emphasizes creating distance, stepping out of the vehicle’s path, and avoiding positions where an officer could be struck or dragged. Putting yourself in the way of a moving car is considered a violation of basic officer-safety principles.
Now consider the earlier incident where he was reportedly dragged. That would have triggered a formal after-action review and almost certainly required retraining focused specifically on vehicle encounters and positioning. At that point, the danger is no longer hypothetical it is documented, understood, and directly addressed through training or corrective action.
When the same officer later places himself in the path of a moving vehicle again, it looks significantly worse from a professional standpoint. It suggests he repeated conduct he had already been trained to avoid. In law-enforcement terms, that shows a failure to apply training and a pattern of negligent behavior, not a one-time mistake.
Finally, in use-of-force evaluations, officers generally cannot create their own danger and then rely on that danger to justify deadly force. If an officer acts contrary to training, puts himself in harm’s way, and then escalates force because of that self-created risk, investigators and courts view that as increased responsibility, not a valid excuse.