Federal Prosecutor Used Fabricated Quotes in Court Filing (2)
Last edited Sat Mar 7, 2026, 02:34 PM - Edit history (2)
Source: Bloomberg Law
Federal Prosecutor Used Fabricated Quotes in Court Filing (2)
March 6, 2026, 4:55 PM EST; Updated: March 6, 2026, 9:08 PM EST
Ben Penn
Senior Reporter
Email Ben Penn
Tweet Ben Penn

Justice Department lawyers in North Carolina are facing possible sanctions for what a magistrate judge called "fabricated quotations and misstatements of case holdings."
Photographer: MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images
An assistant US attorney in North Carolina filed a response with the court that included "fabricated quotations and misstatements of case holdings" and then made "false or misleading statements" of how they got included, a magistrate judge said.
"Because of the seriousness of these issues," senior leaders from the US Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of North Carolina must appear at a show cause hearing next week for why the federal prosecutor responsible shouldn't be sanctioned and why the entire office shouldn't be held jointly responsible, US Magistrate Judge Robert Numbers said in a March 2 order. ... The US attorney's office is representing the Defense Department in a lawsuit by a North Carolina pro se litigant challenging a policy limiting availability of GLP-1 weight loss medications for TRICARE for Life participants.
The plaintiff asserted that a response brief signed by assistant US attorney Rudy Renfer included fabricated quotes and misstated the holdings of several cases. In a reply, Renfer said he "inadvertently included incorrect citations to case law from this circuit" and attributed the errors to the "inadvertent filing of an unfinalized draft document," Numbers said in his order.
{snip}
The pro se plaintiff who caught the errors, Derence Fivehouse, is a retired Air Force colonel and an attorney himself. He's a former staff judge advocate (1) who also served as chief of the legal counsel division (2) at the Air Force Base Conversion Agency in the George W. Bush administration ... In an email to Bloomberg Law Friday night, Fivehouse credited the court for identifying "the most significant issues" after he flagged "a few case misrepresentations."
{snip}
The case is Fivehouse v. Defense Dept., E.D.N.C., No. 2:25-cv-00041. (3)
(Updated with comment from plaintiff.)
To contact the reporter on this story: Ben Penn in Washington at bpenn@bloomberglaw.com
To contact the editors: Seth Stern in Washington at sstern@bloomberglaw.com
(1) https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA281364.pdf
(2) https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CDIR-2002-10-01/pdf/CDIR-2002-10-01-DEPARTMENTS-3.pdf
(3) https://www.bloomberglaw.com/product/blaw/document/X1Q6OSEMSL82?criteria_idb64c7b3d6a191c07d4e465a2d29c366e&searchGuid30d7d168-a18d-472b-9323-9326354ec987
Read more: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/federal-prosecutor-used-fabricated-quotes-false-cites-in-filing
I am editing this story as I go along, so replies might raise issues that were addressed in an edit made after the reply was posted.
The skeet misidentified the pro se litigant as the defendant. He is the plaintiff.
Hat tip, Ken White
Reposted by Special Envoy for the Shield of the Popehats
https://bsky.app/profile/kenwhite.bsky.social
NEWS: A Justice Dept. line attorney in North Carolina fabricated quotes in court filing, causing judge to order hearing to consider sanctions and holding entire US attorneyâs office jointly responsible.
— Ben Penn (@benjaminpenn.bsky.social) 2026-03-06T22:50:39.106Z
Pro se defendant flagged the errors.
news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/...
*******
Ben Penn
@benjaminpenn.bsky.social
NEWS: A Justice Dept. line attorney in North Carolina fabricated quotes in court filing, causing judge to order hearing to consider sanctions and holding entire US attorney's office jointly responsible.
Pro se defendant flagged the errors.
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/federal-prosecutor-used-fabricated-quotes-false-cites-in-filing
Federal Prosecutor Used Fabricated Quotes in Court Filing
An assistant US attorney in North Carolina filed a response with the court that included "fabricated quotations and misstatements of case holdings" and then made "false or misleading statements" of ho...
news.bloomberglaw.com
5:50 PM · Mar 6, 2026
*******
*Pro se plaintiff suing the government, not defendant
— Ben Penn (@benjaminpenn.bsky.social) 2026-03-07T00:28:37.162Z
*******
Ben Penn
@benjaminpenn.bsky.social
*Pro se plaintiff suing the government, not defendant
7:28 PM · Mar 6, 2026
*******
Story is updated to note that pro se plaintiff Derence Fivehouse appears to be a retired colonel and former Air Force attorney.
— Ben Penn (@benjaminpenn.bsky.social) 2026-03-07T01:25:14.530Z
*******
Ben Penn
@benjaminpenn.bsky.social
Story is updated to note that pro se plaintiff Derence Fivehouse appears to be a retired colonel and former Air Force attorney.
8:25 PM · Mar 6, 2026
*******
Another update: Retired Air Force colonel & staff judge advocate Derence Fivehouse emails to say he hopes to learn whether the fabricated "language originated with the signing attorney or was incorporated from another source. That question deserves a clear answer.â
— Ben Penn (@benjaminpenn.bsky.social) 2026-03-07T02:14:38.521Z
*******
Ben Penn
@benjaminpenn.bsky.social
Another update: Retired Air Force colonel & staff judge advocate Derence Fivehouse emails to say he hopes to learn whether the fabricated "language originated with the signing attorney or was incorporated from another source. That question deserves a clear answer.
9:14 PM · Mar 6, 2026
*******
Thanks! To clarify, he emailed you directly?
— Wichelhaus (@formertwtruser.bsky.social) 2026-03-07T02:15:30.857Z
*******
Wichelhaus
@formertwtruser.bsky.social
Thanks! To clarify, he emailed you directly?
9:15 PM · Mar 6, 2026
*******
Correct
— Ben Penn (@benjaminpenn.bsky.social) 2026-03-07T02:17:08.823Z
*******
Ben Penn
@benjaminpenn.bsky.social
Correct
9:18 PM · Mar 6, 2026
*******
Correct
— Ben Penn (@benjaminpenn.bsky.social) 2026-03-07T02:21:03.705Z
*******
Ben Penn
@benjaminpenn.bsky.social
Correct
9:22 PM · Mar 6, 2026
*******
pnwmom
(110,241 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(27,446 posts)The pro se plaintiff who caught the errors, Derence Fivehouse, is a retired Air Force colonel and an attorney himself. He's a former staff judge advocate who also served as chief of the legal counsel division at the Air Force Base Conversion Agency in the George W. Bush administration
mahatmakanejeeves
(69,214 posts)Last edited Sat Mar 7, 2026, 04:21 AM - Edit history (1)
to add the info that the plaintiff is himself an attorney.
I am posting from an Amazon Fire, so articles get posted in dribs and drabs.
And good morning.
pnwmom
(110,241 posts)Those cover pages don't show a person's resume, so I bet the govt. lawyers didn't spot the name of a lawyer who'd served in W's administration.
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
wcmagumba This message was self-deleted by its author.
mahatmakanejeeves
(69,214 posts)Published on:
Mar. 3, 2026
An assistant U.S. attorney in North Carolina, Rudy Renfer, filed a court response containing fabricated quotations and misstatements of case holdings and then made false or misleading statements about how they were included, a federal court found according to a Bloomberg article.
Because of the seriousness of these issues, senior leaders from the Eastern District of North Carolinas U.S. Attorneys Office must appear at a show cause hearing to explain why Renfer shouldnt be sanctioned and why the office shouldnt be held jointly responsible, the court said.
Having reviewed the filings in this matter and other submissions by Renfer, the court has serious concerns about the accuracy of certain quotations and representations in Renfers filings and the explanation offered for their inclusion, the court said.
The court identified several fabricated quotes and misstatements of multiple circuit court opinions, as well as two fabricated quotes from the Code of Federal Regulations.
The case is Fivehouse v. Defense Dept., No. 2:25-cv-00041 (E.D.N.C.).
barbtries
(31,284 posts)North Carolina, this state where i live, where republicans rule.
so, they're catapulting the propaganda into the Court.
popsdenver
(2,132 posts)by all the Trumphumping Republican voters in all the red states, like this one, who believe that THEY will come out of this unscathed..........despite evidence already being displayed to the opposite........
Florida being a prime example.......If only they had a single Hurricane last year, and got a taste of what Trump's FEMA WOULDN'T have done for them, maybe that would have wised up a few of them in that state. But even then, I doubt it.
THE RepubliCONs truly lucked out on that one........
wolfie001
(7,523 posts)popsdenver
(2,132 posts)The Republican CABAL has obliterated our Judicial and Legislative Branches at all levels........
They selectively use them, only when they feel the law suits them...........
All of these who face "sanctions" should be incarcerated, and at a minimum lose their law licenses anywhere in this country, forever........
It is absolutely un-fathomable, the destruction that is being done by Republicans, Corporations, and Trump at orders of Putin..
Frankly nothing like this could have happened if it weren't for the U.S. CORPORATIONS, financially backing every Republican in the U.S. Senate and U.S. House, as well as paying for the Republican Justices in the U.S. Supreme Court....
I am waiting for the United States of America to be renamed: THE UNITED CORPORATIONS OF AMERICA......
wolfie001
(7,523 posts)Wolfie's in agreement! lol
popsdenver
(2,132 posts)love your name......LOL
wolfie001
(7,523 posts)Named after my fave pupper! Up there in doggie heaven.
popsdenver
(2,132 posts)what Amadeus' wife used to call him instead of Wolfgang.......
wolfie001
(7,523 posts)One of my favorite movies of all time. The opening symphony #25. So great!
One of my top ten movies of all time.............All acting was superior..........
pfitz59
(12,598 posts)what's left are third tier MAGA zealots
highplainsdem
(61,486 posts)every detail of every result is always stupid), which Bloomberg mentioned. The stupid and apparently AI-using attorney hasn't yet confirmed that AI was used, but has been asked about it.
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/federal-prosecutor-used-fabricated-quotes-false-cites-in-filing
cbabe
(6,548 posts)citizenry who cant discern ai slop from the real.
A lawyer I know is already seeing this. If you dont know whats correct then you cant review for it.
Like the kids who dont know where east and west are. They just look at their phones for where to go.
highplainsdem
(61,486 posts)could be counted on for accuracy and real intelligence.
But since it can never be depended on - can always be hallucinating/fabricating results - people are surrendering their own ability to think to idiot machines.
Martin68
(27,534 posts)population will have a better understanding of the weaknesses in AI and better able to discern its effects. If enough lawyers have their reputations ruined by the careless use of AI, successful lawyers will learn how to use AI more judiciously and with better oversight.
cbabe
(6,548 posts)Martin68
(27,534 posts)the strengths and weaknesses of of AI as we learn more about both. We used to conduce atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons until we became aware of the effects that could have on the health of the population. There is a learning curve.
popsdenver
(2,132 posts)The Corporations, Heritage Foundation, 2025 crowd and Lobbyists write the papers, and just give them to Politicians and Legal crowd to just present as their own........In Congress, AND the courts......
Ocelot II
(130,201 posts)Any time you cite a case you have to cite check it, meaning that it really says what you claim it says and that it hasn't been overruled or distinguished. Maybe AI is supposed to be doing this, too, but at some point there has to be a human editor.
Ilikepurple
(577 posts)I certainly dont have any direct knowledge and understand the compulsion to blame AI, but Im growing less trusting of claims made by the DOJ. Unless theres a new cutout for AI use, theres still a duty to present accurate and current case law. I do wonder if wishful AI prompts might be more likely to color the response attorneys get? If it is AI at the root, these kind of mistakes will cost lives in court, in surgery, in engineering, and other professions. I dont think we can turn back the clock, so I hope every professional organization remains vigilant and transparent about the limitations of AI.
Ocelot II
(130,201 posts)(certainly the one in my district, which has lost more than half of its lawyers in the last six months), they are in sorry shape. A lot of lawyers, probably the best ones, have either been fired or have quit because they wouldn't do the unethical things their DoJ bosses wanted them to do. They've been trying to hire but there's a loyalty test; lawyers have to agree to advance the interests of Trump, not neutrally follow the law, so the best people aren't applying any more. AUSA jobs were once really desirable and prestigious (I actually got an AUSA interview as a new law grad, and even though I didn't get the job I was pretty proud of myself for just getting the interview); now they can't get anybody except hard-core MAGAs or people who are so desperate for a job that they'll agree to compromise their ethics. As a result the offices are so thinly and incompetently staffed that they're throwing their assignments into the AI cesspool and not cite-checking or editing the results just in order to get their work done on time.
Old Crank
(6,884 posts)At work again.
Oooo we sent in the wrong filing. Sorry about that.
Courts have been catching the DOJ s lawyers in all sorts of fraudulent filings and statements. The lawyers will get a very short leash if the judge doesn't remove them entirely.
This is why Bondi wants to have say over state bars.
popsdenver
(2,132 posts)Or Republican appointed judges in the lower courts................They haven't been catching a profound amount of crap going on....
Martin68
(27,534 posts)Renew Deal
(84,934 posts)Because it's pretty unlikely that "fabricated quotes" would be sourced some other way
Quanto Magnus
(1,335 posts)The liars need to spend time in jail and be disbarred. They need time to think about their choices in life, isolated from the rest of the citizenry.
pat_k
(13,146 posts)One thing that is probably true is that the assumption that assertions in court filings are true has allowed these people to get away with lies, particularly early on when assumptions of integrity hadn't been smashed to smithereens.
Now plaintiff's in cases against the regime and courts hearing cases brought by or against the regime "get it" that the felon's appointees and sycophants make things up as a matter of standard practice.
LetMyPeopleVote
(178,538 posts)The DOJ has been gutted of the competent attorneys by trump