Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(173,827 posts)
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 01:35 PM 22 hrs ago

Supreme Court will consider whether laws called assault weapons bans violate the Second Amendment

Source: AP

Updated 1:22 PM EDT, June 30, 2026


WASHINGTON (AP) — A Supreme Court that has expanded gun rights will consider whether bans on semiautomatic rifles, often called assault weapons, violate the Second Amendment.

The justices said Tuesday they will hear appeals challenging bans on the AR-15 and similar semiautomatic firearms in Connecticut and the Chicago area.

Similar laws are in place in about a dozen states, covering major cities like New York, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. Congress allowed a national assault weapons ban to expire in 2004, but Democrats have supported renewing it in response to a series of mass shootings. States have also continued to pass their own laws, including recent measures in Virginia and Rhode Island.

It is the latest high-profile dispute over guns to reach the court since its conservative majority handed down a landmark ruling in 2022 that expanded Second Amendment rights and spawned challenges to firearm laws around the country. Arguments are expected to be heard in the fall.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-assault-weapons-ban-ar15-a362863265ba8630e71068fe5b75bb8e

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court will consider whether laws called assault weapons bans violate the Second Amendment (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 22 hrs ago OP
Since the 6 fascist court majority are so afraid of their security, a problem they themselves created, I would be ImNotGod 22 hrs ago #1
Or their fears could cause them to vote against the bans PatSeg 22 hrs ago #2
If they do, well, then, it's machine guns for everyone ashredux 22 hrs ago #3
Who said "small artillery"? And one boy's small is anothers ginormous. erronis 21 hrs ago #7
If they do, well, then, it's machine guns for everyone ashredux 22 hrs ago #4
how come they ignore the well-regulated part of the 2nd? pansypoo53219 22 hrs ago #5
You know, one of these years .. not in my lifetime ... the Court will finally take "well-regulated' into account. ificandream 18 hrs ago #12
If you had participated in DU's long-ago Gungeon debates, you'd know maxsolomon 18 hrs ago #14
language does change. pansypoo53219 14 hrs ago #15
Tell that to the "Originalists" maxsolomon 1 hr ago #16
This was addressed in the Heller decision PCB66 25 min ago #17
It would seem to me Mr.Bee 21 hrs ago #6
Ballistic missile? Bullets made with spent uranium? (Or not spent yet.) erronis 21 hrs ago #8
It was written for muskets Bayard 21 hrs ago #9
With so many Americans living in fear of someone lost knocking on their door, Torchlight 21 hrs ago #10
"Supreme Court will consider" J_William_Ryan 19 hrs ago #11
The only possible way and i mean only possible way THIS supreme court would ban assault weapons is bluestarone 18 hrs ago #13
If they're so original purr-rat beauty 23 min ago #18

ImNotGod

(1,333 posts)
1. Since the 6 fascist court majority are so afraid of their security, a problem they themselves created, I would be
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 02:01 PM
22 hrs ago

Last edited Tue Jun 30, 2026, 03:22 PM - Edit history (1)

surprised if they rule against the bans. They are spending a ton of taxpayer money on security upgrades, protection from the very gun toting wingnuts they emboldened.

ificandream

(11,872 posts)
12. You know, one of these years .. not in my lifetime ... the Court will finally take "well-regulated' into account.
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 06:04 PM
18 hrs ago

And overhaul their definition of the Second Amendment.

You read it here first.

maxsolomon

(39,462 posts)
14. If you had participated in DU's long-ago Gungeon debates, you'd know
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 06:33 PM
18 hrs ago

"Well-Regulated" is an anachronistic term that means "well-equipped" or "well-functioning", not actual regulations on who can bear arms. Any yahoo qualifies (except Hunter Biden).

More importantly, the preamble is just explaining why the gubmint can't infringe - because we need militias for "security" (AKA suppressing slave revolts).

Moreover, what are "Arms"? Flintlocks? Full-automatic firearms? Rocket-propelled grenades? The ambiguity means "Arms" are anything we decide they are.

We already know the answer the SCOTUS will give r.e. "Assault Weapons" laws: guns must be free and omnipresent.

PCB66

(209 posts)
17. This was addressed in the Heller decision
Wed Jul 1, 2026, 12:09 PM
25 min ago

In the vernacular of the time when the Bill of Rights was drafted "well regulated" meant well supplied. Not what we would call regulated by the government nowadays.

I suspect that since they took up the case they have intentions of overturning the bans in the states that have them. otherwise they wouldn't have taken the case.

Probably one last big "fuck you" by Thomas.

Mr.Bee

(1,997 posts)
6. It would seem to me
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 02:42 PM
21 hrs ago

there would have to be a CLEAR definition of what 'arms' are.
A Handgun?
A Machine gun?
A Rocket-Propelled Grenade?
A tank?

Torchlight

(7,269 posts)
10. With so many Americans living in fear of someone lost knocking on their door,
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 03:33 PM
21 hrs ago

(or asserting fear as the most convenient excuse to shoot someone), I'd be surprised to see anything other than current restrictions begin relaxed, removed, and thinned.

J_William_Ryan

(3,672 posts)
11. "Supreme Court will consider"
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 05:24 PM
19 hrs ago

It won’t ‘consider’ anything – the conservatives’ minds are made up to strike down AWBs.

bluestarone

(22,586 posts)
13. The only possible way and i mean only possible way THIS supreme court would ban assault weapons is
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 06:15 PM
18 hrs ago

If these weapons could NOT be banned in every court house or supreme court room, and RALLIES across the country. I'm 100% against assault weapons BUT if they are allowed by the courts, then these weapons should be allowed wherever judges hold hearings against these bans.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court will consid...