House Republicans resurrect Save America Act by adding it to spending bill
Source: The Guardian
Wed 15 Jul 2026 17.17 EDT
Last modified on Wed 15 Jul 2026 19.46 EDT
House Republicans on Wednesday made another attempt to answer Donald Trumps demand for new restrictions on voting nationwide by linking the measure to an unrelated spending bill and passing both largely along party lines. The effort was the latest attempt by congressional Republicans to pass the Save America Act, which would ban mail-in ballots and impose new identification requirements on voters when they register and cast ballots.
While the Trump administration has cast the bill as necessary to prevent non-citizens from voting and combat election fraud, voting rights advocates say theres no evidence of widespread election tampering and warn the bill could disenfranchise swaths of eligible voters ahead of Novembers midterm elections. The House of Representatives approved a version of the bill in February, but it has no path to passing the Senate, where top Democrats oppose the measure and can wield the filibuster to halt its advancement.
Rightwing House Republicans have nonetheless insisted that their leaders make the bill a priority, and Speaker Mike Johnson agreed to a plan to combine the Save America Act with a bill authorizing spending by the state department and related agencies, which the House passed by a 217-209 vote on Wednesday afternoon.
The Senates top Democrat Chuck Schumer vowed to again block the measure, as his party did when majority leader John Thune earlier this year opened debate on the Save America Act under pressure from Trump and his allies.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/15/house-republicans-save-america-act-spending-bill
no_hypocrisy
(55,967 posts)b/c it isnt about spending.
OLDMDDEM
(3,359 posts)ProudMNDemocrat
(21,059 posts)There is not the 60 votes to pass it.
Even Republicans know that it affects their voters as much as it affects Democratic voters. For most women take on their husband's names after marriage, do not have Passports, or the documents needed to prove who they are. Nor do they want the Federal government have their respective state's voter roll information.
ProudMNDemocrat
(21,059 posts)There's not the 60 votes to pass it, even with the Senate Parliamentarian shooting it down because this has NOTHING to do with the Budget.
Bayard
(30,947 posts)Like so many other things that trump fixates on. We will see more evidence of that tonight in his speech.
slightlv
(8,337 posts)because I refuse to watch trump defile the nation and our values on public TV...especially when the networks refused to allow Joe Biden to talk about the importance of hanging on to our democracy. I've had a miserable couple of months around here, crisis-wise, and I don't need my blood pressure rising to unmanageable heights. So, I'm out for tonight. I'll Star Trek it, instead... *immerse* myself in DEI, and trust that all will be recounted here later in the night or tomorrow... To all who have stomachs for watching, I salute you!
Bayard
(30,947 posts)I thought I might watch it but with closed captioning, since the sound of his voice makes me sick. Maybe I'll wait for a transcipt.