Why Trump keeps reading printouts of news articles at his trial
Why Trump keeps reading printouts of news articles at his trial
Its an unorthodox strategy for a criminal defendant, yet it embodies the former presidents penchant for showmanship and determination to discredit his case.
By Marianne LeVine and Adriana Usero
May 22, 2024 at 9:33 a.m. EDT
NEW YORK Former president Donald Trump has established an unusual courthouse ritual as he attends his New York hush money trial: He regularly addresses reporters with printouts of what appear to be news stories, and legal analysis that he cites, often invoking others talking about him.
Frequently, Trump leafs through his stack of papers in front of TV cameras, quoting mostly conservative legal commentators who have tried to discredit the case. He has also repeatedly cited polling that shows him ahead of President Biden and touched on immigration and inflation, despite saying the trial has prevented him from campaigning.
Its an unorthodox strategy for a criminal defendant, legal experts said, yet it embodies the former presidents penchant for showmanship and determination to discredit his case in multiple ways frequently involving baseless or exaggerated claims. It also displays his longtime preference for printed papers. When he was in the White House, Trump would watch multiple TVs, while reviewing printed out press clippings, said a former Trump administration official, who was granted anonymity to speak about the habit.
Hes using them more as a visual aid and crutch, said Ken White, a First Amendment litigator, in a text. Hes always been big on having people print things out so he can look at them and wave them around. ... Generally criminal defendants dont run their mouths during trial, because its extremely foolish," White added.
{snip}
Scott Clement and Rachel Siegel contributed to this report.
By Marianne LeVine
Marianne LeVine is a national political reporter for The Washington Post. Twitter https://twitter.com/marianne_levine
By Adriana Usero
Adriana Usero has been a video editor on The Fact Checker since 2020. Adriana was part of a team of journalists that won a Pulitzer Prize for Public Service in 2021. She was previously embedded with the General Assignment desk and Opinions section. She joined The Post in 2016 and was born and raised in San Juan, Puerto Rico. Twitter https://twitter.com/AdriUsero
Demsrule86
(70,773 posts)duckworth969
(965 posts)Those papers serve as his blankie.
Irish_Dem
(55,825 posts)Demsrule86
(70,773 posts)Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #1)
duckworth969 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Arne
(3,533 posts)Demsrule86
(70,773 posts)He is cunning but not intelligent.
Blue Owl
(54,162 posts)He sucks big time
Demsrule86
(70,773 posts)unblock
(53,991 posts)Oh yeah, because they suck and are biased to promote him.
The trial is news, of course. Fine.
The defendant should be able to comment on the proceedings, fine.
But he's not making news. After the first appearance, we knew he though it was a sham trial, biden bad, me martyr, I'm innocent, etc. defendant at trial proclaims innocence is a one-sentence but of a story about the trial, it's not a daily event. There's no journalistic merit in covering his rants daily. All they're doing after the first one is promoting him.
Demsrule86
(70,773 posts)SWBTATTReg
(23,891 posts)these printouts. Of course, they're very biased and opinion-based, and not worth the very paper they're printed on. Isn't anything associated w/ tRUMP garbage?