Why New York City Real Estate Brokers Are Losing Their Minds

At a recent street protest, I asked some why they’re so angry.

BY ALEXANDER SAMMON
JUNE 17, 2024

Hundreds of real estate brokers were spilling off the sidewalk and into the street around New York City Hall. “There will be more,” broker Graig Linn assured me, venti iced Starbucks coffee in hand. “It’s 9 a.m. That’s tough for brokers.”

Even that early, all the big real estate agencies were represented. Sotheby’s brokers were there in matching shirts. Douglas Elliman brokers were there in matching shirts. Bond brokers were there in matching hats. Corcoran brokers were there in matching hats and matching shirts. Everyone in attendance was gathered to object to a New York City Council bill that would save tenants from having to pay fees to real estate brokers who were hired by landlords—i.e., brokers that tenants did not hire. In other words, it was a rally for keeping the fees on the backs of tenants.

New York City is one of only two cities in America that allow this practice, and during a time of skyrocketing housing costs, it has become an increasingly loathed, hard-to-explain payment—one that usually falls between 10 to 15 percent of the annual lease amount to the broker who shows the apartment. For example, if you rent a two-bedroom apartment in Brooklyn for $3,800 a month, you can expect to pay a $7,000 fee to someone who maybe only let you in to see the place and then handed you a lease to sign. The New York City Council bill, called Intro 360 and spearheaded by Bedford–Stuyvesant Councilman Chi Ossé, would force landlords, not tenants, to pay the brokers those landlords hire.

This has infuriated brokers—who, not incidentally, share a muscled-up lobbying group with landlords.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/06/broker-fee-ban-tenants-renters-real-estate-new-york-city-inflation-housing-apartments.html