Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
How to Counteract the Court
Relevant look back to 2020Congress has the power to override Supreme Court rulings based on statutory interpretations.
BY RACHEL M. COHEN, MARCIA BROWN NOVEMBER 24, 2020
From 1979 until her retirement in 1998, Lilly Ledbetter worked at Goodyear Tire and Rubbers plant in Gadsden, Alabama. Once she had left the job, she learned a disturbing fact. When Ledbetter had started, her supervisor salary was comparable to that of men in similar positions. But with each performance review, the men she worked alongside got bigger raises, and she gradually fell further and further behind. By the time she retired, she was earning $3,727 a month, hundreds of dollars less than the lowest-paid man in her position, and significantly below the average man.
Ledbetter took Goodyear to court, alleging a blatant violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which guarantees equal treatment in the workplace. But in 2007, the Supreme Court held that the statute of limitations on her claims had expired, and she could no longer seek redress. She would have had to file her claim shortly after Goodyear hired her, the Court ruled. This was an absurd requestLedbetter didnt know how she was being cheated until she neared retirementand it served to gut the ability of any woman to reasonably enforce the law.
The Court had issued whats known as a statutory ruling, which is distinct from a constitutional ruling. In other words, the Court had not deemed the law itself to be unconstitutional, but merely ruled that the way the statute had been written rendered it unavailable to Ledbetter.
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote a dissent that urged Congress to intervene. The Courts interpretation, Ginsburg said, was out of step with modern wage discrimination and the realities of the workplace. She recommended Congress amend the law, and fix the Courts parsimonious reading, so workers like Ledbetter could have a shot at restitution. Ginsburg added: [T]he ball is in Congress court.
https://prospect.org/justice/how-to-counteract-the-supreme-court/
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How to Counteract the Court (Original Post)
Passages
Jul 2024
OP
vapor2
(1,603 posts)1. I read that Joe Morelle is attempting to overturn this insane ruling
Passages
(1,381 posts)2. Great to hear. Thank you.
no matter what the result it is important this issue and its implications be brought out to the public
Igel
(36,201 posts)5. Why? It's no longer an issue.
Ledbetter became a proxy for the cause of equal pay for equal work, and Democrats pledged to fight the ruling the first chance they got. And they did, rewriting the statute so that the clock would start ticking on the statute of limitations each time a discriminatory paycheck was issued, not at the time an employee was first hired. The very first piece of legislation President Barack Obama signed in 2009 was the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.
RBG said it was up to Congress to opine on the matter, and Congress so opined. The SCOTUS' opinion is less "overturned" than "the law is changed so SCOTUS' opinion is no longer relevant."
BTW, "it's up to Congress to change the law" is a standard SCOTUS trope. Very often the SCOTUS opinion's basically tell Congress what revisions are necessary to the law to get to a different outcome.
oldmanlynn
(489 posts)3. Its our only hope is to win the house senate and presidency
We can still do it. We have over performed in several years worth of elections and its even greater now with roe getting overturned. The republicans stink and so does trump. The country knows this.
Dems need to stay united