Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(73,120 posts)
Wed Jul 3, 2024, 08:29 AM Jul 2024

Judge Merchan faces the task of applying the Supreme Court's immunity ruling.--2 key questions.........

Lots of information included. I will read sometime later...


Following Supreme Court ruling, what happens next in Trump's criminal hush money case?


Judge Merchan faces the task of applying the Supreme Court's immunity ruling.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/supreme-court-ruling-trumps-criminal-hush-money-case/story?id=111625803&cid=social_twitter_abcn


By Peter Charalambous July 3, 2024, 4:04 AM


With Donald Trump's sentencing in his New York hush money case delayed until September following Tuesday's decision by Judge Juan Merchan, the judge now faces the task of applying the Supreme Court's new test for the limits of presidential immunity to the former president's criminal conviction.

Trump in May was found guilty on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to a 2016 hush money payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels in order to boost his electoral prospects in the 2016 presidential election.

Trump's lawyers have argued that the judge should "set aside" the jury's verdict in the case because the jury heard evidence during the trial that would have been protected by presidential immunity, based on Monday's ruling by the Supreme Court that Trump is entitled to "at least presumptive immunity" from criminal prosecution for official acts taken while in office.
MORE: Judge in Trump's criminal hush money case postpones sentencing to Sept. 18

To rule on the defense's request -- which Judge Merchan plans to do by Sept. 6 -- he will likely have to answer two key questions, according to former federal prosecutor Jarrod Schaeffer.

The first question is, would the Supreme Court's decision have limited some of the evidence and testimony at trial?..........
...............................

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge Merchan faces the task of applying the Supreme Court's immunity ruling.--2 key questions......... (Original Post) riversedge Jul 2024 OP
They are NY state convictions. State convictions, not federal. brush Jul 2024 #1
And yet states are subordinate to the Constitution. Igel Jul 2024 #3
There's nothing unconstitutional about the state on NY finding trump guilty. brush Jul 2024 #4
To answer your question gab13by13 Jul 2024 #2

Igel

(36,082 posts)
3. And yet states are subordinate to the Constitution.
Wed Jul 3, 2024, 05:41 PM
Jul 2024

They cannot pass laws that the Constitution forbids. "Incorporation" is the fancy word for it.

gab13by13

(25,224 posts)
2. To answer your question
Wed Jul 3, 2024, 08:44 AM
Jul 2024

Some evidence may not be allowed, like Hope Hick's testimony in the Oval office, that evidence may now not be allowed, but it may not be needed. We still have the David Pecker evidence from the Oval office and that testimony certainly is not official business.

I believe there will be enough evidence that is allowable to sustain the conviction.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Judge Merchan faces the t...