How the death of middlebrow culture led to Trump's barbarism
How the death of middlebrow culture led to Trumps barbarism
All the cool people hated middle-class suburban culture but it looks a lot better compared to what came next
By Mike Lofgren
Contributing Writer
Published April 19, 2026 9:00AM (EDT)
(Salon) Those of us of a certain age can remember the middle-class suburban home of the late 1950s and early 1960s. On the coffee table lay a large format book titled The Worlds Most Beautiful Paintings, or something similar. The bookshelf groaned under the weight of the Encyclopedia Britannica, or perhaps Colliers Encyclopedia. Alongside it were volumes of the various Book of the Month Club selections. The console where the hi-fi lived might have a Readers Digest boxed set of vinyl LPs called Music of the Worlds Greatest Composers (pressed under contract by RCA), or a Time-Life classical music compilation.
....(snip)....
The terms highbrow and lowbrow derived from the 19th-century pseudoscience of phrenology, and the former was first popularized by a New York Sun reporter around 1902, to be quickly followed by the latter. Middlebrow dates to the 1920s, first used by the British humor magazine Punch. Virginia Woolf then got into the act, criticizing the BBC Home Service as middlebrow, despite its newsreaders plummy Oxbridge accents. Elsewhere she defined the term as this mixture of geniality and sentiment stuck together with a sticky slime of calfs-foot jelly.
....(snip)....
What would Woolf possibly have made of the spectacle of postwar America? The GI Bill and the industrial boom drove the greatest project of mass education and mass consumption in world history. The huge expansion of universities created millions of graduates eager for cultural experience, along with a better life than they, or any previous generation, had experienced before the war. Equally, the need for professors and instructors engendered by the college boom created its own class of intellectuals and intellectual hangers-on. Some of those eagerly sought to enlighten their charges, while a few others grew to see or claimed to see an unbridgeable chasm between the ivory tower and mass cultural aspiration.
....(snip)....
The Vietnam War and the culture wars it spawned drove a stake through the heart of middlebrow culture, as well as the high culture it supported, just as it killed progressivism as a mainstream political movement. Almost the entire intellectual class opposed the war, but many in that class seemed to adopt the non-sequitur that because the war was evil, it was a waste of time to enforce the most minimal cultural standards. Hence the plethora of comic book studies courses at universities today. Or they retreated, following Macdonalds advice, into social irrelevance by adopting dead-end pseudo-philosophies like deconstructionism. Middlebrow culture slowly died along with the highbrows disappearance from public life. ..........(more)
https://www.salon.com/2026/04/19/how-the-death-of-middlebrow-culture-led-to-trumps-barbarism/
J_William_Ryan
(3,530 posts)Reagan destroyed the middleclass, which led to Trump's barbarism.
And it was conservative reactionaryism and the Christo-fascist right empowered by Reagan that killed progressivism as a mainstream political movement conservative reactionaryism that sought to compel conformity and punish dissent, diversity, inclusion, and expressions of individual liberty.
Conservativism embraced racism, bigotry, and hate, fear, ignorance, and lies to facilitate Republican political success resulting in the Trump malignancy.
cachukis
(4,018 posts)The forces of conflict during the Vietnam War, while breaking, in some fashion, the establishment, the vacuum that followed led to what we see now as the last chances for the middle class.
The article expresses the challenges unmet by the highbrow. The middlebrow grew from the success of the GI Bill and the money game became the adman's dream.
Tearing things down, the rebellion of the 60's, was emotional. There was no plan to rebuild.
Ideological George McGovern was crushed and erased. The hole had been paved over.
Cirsium
(3,990 posts)What was torn down in the 60s?
cachukis
(4,018 posts)The Civil Rights Act broke down doors in schools, voting booths and employment. The women's movement gained momentum that allowed for an independence with rights that had been exclusionary. Like credit. Birth control, the Pill, created a sexual revolution. The draft, was challenged and eventually cancelled.
The protests against the establishment opened doors in myriad ways.
The button downed mind of what was, was upended by the children of the generation that grew up in the depression and fought the fascists.
Wow. Civil Rights, Women's rights means "tearing down?"
Overcoming barriers to people's full life expression is building up, not tearing down.
cachukis
(4,018 posts)restriction as the point. The rights of blacks, immigrants, women, LGBTQ, divorcees and the like, were restricted by the white supremacists that are trying to take back the country.
All people want to live free of restrictions forced on them. It is still a fight to keep them from being reimposed.
It is the white nationalists, the Nixonites and Reaganites, the misogynists who led to Trump, not the Freedom Riders, not the Women's Liberation advocates, not the antiwar protestors, not the LBGTQ activists, not the "hippies."
cachukis
(4,018 posts)American as all of us. We have not been able to educate nor mold them into socially accepting our openness to all of mankind.
They are now fighting tooth and nail to hold onto the gains they have made with trump.
Woe to us having been unable to stop him and his minions.
Hey Joe
(697 posts)and paying attention for decades, I tend to agree with your assessment more than the articles.
The Reagan revolution bent this country into the shape we are in now.
displacedvermoter
(4,760 posts)highplainsdem
(62,622 posts)like ALEC, the American Legislative Exchange Council. Much of that funded by RW billionaires who wanted to reduce their own taxes and destroy the social safery net created by liberals.
Popular culture is not the threat, and in fact popular music has always helped movements for social justice.
Snobbery by the elites will turn people against them, but that's been true throughout history.
The decline in classical music sales compared to popular music is mostly because it does not have large numbers of new composers creating new classical music. Classical music fans, once they have recordings of favorite symphonies by the great classical composers, are not going to be buying new recordings of classical music very often. Not unless audio technology improves, anyway, when they might replace all or most of their collection with the latest type of recording.