Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

TexasTowelie

(116,809 posts) Sat Sep 23, 2023, 07:56 AM Sep 2023

China's Economy Won't Pass the US - Wright; China's Global Strategy; Russia-China - China Update

00:00 Introduction
00:56 Russia-China Relations
04:22 Ideology: China & The ‘Global South’
09:07 China’s Economic Growth Trend

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

China's Economy Won't Pass the US - Wright; China's Global Strategy; Russia-China - China Update (Original Post) TexasTowelie Sep 2023 OP

Is this consultant named Tony Wright? Do you know anything about him? I can't find much, which ancianita Sep 2023 #1

I don't know his complete name and he hasn't presented too much information about himself TexasTowelie Sep 2023 #2

Thanks. I just hope ancianita Sep 2023 #3

ancianita

(38,580 posts)

1. Is this consultant named Tony Wright? Do you know anything about him? I can't find much, which

Reply to TexasTowelie (Original post)

Sat Sep 23, 2023, 08:57 AM

Sep 2023

is why I ask. Thanks.

TexasTowelie

(116,809 posts)

2. I don't know his complete name and he hasn't presented too much information about himself

Reply to ancianita (Reply #1)

Sat Sep 23, 2023, 09:11 AM

Sep 2023

other than he is originally from New Zealand and that he studied at the University of Peking. I do respect his analysis and his relatively tame demeanor compared to other authorities about China.

ancianita

(38,580 posts)

3. Thanks. I just hope

Reply to TexasTowelie (Reply #2)

Sat Sep 23, 2023, 09:19 AM

Sep 2023

that he's got a bio that doesn't compromise our need for accurate geopolitical info.

Reply to this discussion