Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

True Dough

(21,537 posts)
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 12:46 PM Jan 11

Is your footwear not lasting as long as it used to?

Is it just my imagination, or is there a whole lot more crummy products out there in footwear land?

My new running shoes every spring usually have a very thin layer of mesh/nylon/breathable fabric that pierces ever so easily.

The last pair of rain boots I purchased started leaking around the sole within 30 days, so fortunately I was able to exchange those.

My latest pair of winter boots also split along a seam (well, one of them has), but they are a year and a half old so there will be no returns or exchanges there.

Each of these items cost me close to $100 (more for the winter boots), so it's not high-end but it's not the cheapest stuff either.

Is there any particular brand of footwear that you still swear by?

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is your footwear not lasting as long as it used to? (Original Post) True Dough Jan 11 OP
Blundstone ZDU Jan 11 #1
Perhaps more so than most any products bucolic_frolic Jan 11 #2
THIS. snot Jan 11 #18
Not your imagination Cirsium Jan 11 #3
I'm going to check those out True Dough Jan 11 #19
Merrell still makes dependable shoes. Hope22 Jan 11 #4
Merrell's are great shoes VMA131Marine Jan 11 #6
Same here! Hope22 Jan 11 #7
Yes. I wear a lot of Merrills. Hoka One One walking/hiking shoes & boots. Timberline still makes a good hlthe2b Jan 11 #11
I've given up on Merrill... 2naSalit Jan 11 #13
I've been backpacking for nearly 40 years, and have worn a lot a lot of boots Martin Eden Jan 11 #24
I've been looking for... 2naSalit Jan 11 #25
Hiking boots are an investment. These list for $330, but occasionally go on sale. Martin Eden Jan 11 #28
They don't have man size feet shoes. GreenWave Jan 11 #32
Birkenstock,,,,, KarenS Jan 11 #5
My feet are not lasting as long as they used to. Sneederbunk Jan 11 #8
We used to have a shoe repair shop near me Diamond_Dog Jan 11 #9
Red Wing WmChris Jan 11 #10
Western Chief for boots KT2000 Jan 11 #12
SAS shoes lonely bird Jan 11 #14
My favorite. rubbersole Jan 11 #21
May get SAS 'boots,' wear their shoes every day. elleng Jan 11 #27
Orthofeet Grumpy Old Guy Jan 11 #15
NOT BY A LONG SHOT Skittles Jan 11 #16
I would be happy to have a decent selection. Old Crank Jan 11 #17
Whoa! Size 16-17? True Dough Jan 11 #20
My son was a ball boy for the Orlando Magic for 10 years. rubbersole Jan 11 #23
Reed boots dpibel Jan 11 #22
No, but my boots (25+ years old) finally expired! elleng Jan 11 #26
Yes when I was working many years ago in retail they lasted a long time. TommieMommy Jan 11 #29
My Thom Mcan sandals from 1978 lasted through my three months in no_hypocrisy Jan 11 #30
I find SAS and Hotter work for me. SharonClark Jan 11 #31
So, I was a land surveyor for almost twelve years. OldBaldy1701E Jan 11 #33
I like New Balance. Elessar Zappa Jan 11 #34

bucolic_frolic

(48,356 posts)
2. Perhaps more so than most any products
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 01:01 PM
Jan 11

shoe brands have been bought and sold over the last 100 years. Wiki some known brands and follow the links. Even Florsheim has new owners.

After a buyout the new owners need to pay for the acquisition: financing, lawyers, MBAs, downsizing. SO they cheapen the brand they just bought. Could be reducing product lines. Or just plain cheaper materials.

With so many takeovers even the large independents need to reduce costs to compete. Look at Nike.

Trace Reebok, and its private equity partners.

SO yes the shoes are deteriorating. $90 for mesh and poured sole with poor if any arch support. Gimme me 1984 Nikes.

I like Rockport. THey've been cheapened, no replaceable midsoles any more, but few went that route anyway. And they've changed hands several times.

snot

(10,928 posts)
18. THIS.
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 03:37 PM
Jan 11

LBO's are mostly another form of financialization/value-extraction at the expense of consumers and employees below the senior exec level. The co. is saddled with enormous debt; lay-offs and reductions in product quality are instituted; banks, shareholders, and sr. execs get big payouts; the rest of us suffer and the co. often goes bankrupt. It's paper-ownership -shuffling that reduces real value and redistributes cash to the 1% while appearing to contribute to GDP.

Cirsium

(1,590 posts)
3. Not your imagination
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 01:04 PM
Jan 11

Yes, there a whole lot more crummy products out there in footwear land. Our experience is exactly as you describe.

One exception: Thorogood boots. 10 years of rugged use and they are as good as new. The Thorogood "Heritage Line" boots are still made in a Union shop in Wisconsin.

Hope22

(3,415 posts)
4. Merrell still makes dependable shoes.
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 01:07 PM
Jan 11

They have seasonal sales and stand behind their products.

Hope22

(3,415 posts)
7. Same here!
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 01:19 PM
Jan 11

I surprised myself when looking for hidden Christmas presents I came across a shoe box with a new pair that I had forgotten about. LOL! I try to always buy when they are on sale. We especially like the waterproof hiking boots which we take the hose to from time to time and have been known to throw some of our favorites in the washing machine! 😁🤣😁

hlthe2b

(107,598 posts)
11. Yes. I wear a lot of Merrills. Hoka One One walking/hiking shoes & boots. Timberline still makes a good
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 01:53 PM
Jan 11

hiking boot too. If they are goretex then fine for snow/ice/water.

I have a bad ankle so I routinely wear a Korean-designed shoe manufactured in Germany that, after COVID became impossible to find here. I can still find them occasionally online or eBay. I have had issues with them every once in a while with the soles becoming partially unattached. I had to go online to find a special shoe glue (AMAZON) to repair them because superglue and the like just don't work. But, once repaired with that product, they have lasted the normal 6 months or so of pretty heavy daily "mileage."

2naSalit

(94,850 posts)
13. I've given up on Merrill...
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 03:25 PM
Jan 11

I wore their shoes exclusively for 25 years but the last few, their products have left me disappointed in their quality and construction. The last pair of hiking boots the I really liked only lasted the summer and they don't even make them anymore. The ones that are most common suck because the padding around the ankle is so thick and made of fabric that I end up with tons of grass seed in my ankles and socks, down into the foot padding and the laces won't stay tied... that it's not worth even the first ten minutes.

I won't buy them again, I'll pay for Scarpa or some other well made brand.

Martin Eden

(13,739 posts)
24. I've been backpacking for nearly 40 years, and have worn a lot a lot of boots
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 04:10 PM
Jan 11

The trend among many backpackers has been trail runners, non-waterproof. They expect to buy a new pair every year when used vigorously, preferring less weight on their feet to go fast & light. As I've gotten older I need more support, and I mostly hike in cool temps so I prefer waterproof. I no longer try to cover long distances per day, a little extra weight on my feet is not much of a factor.

Before buying my most recent boots I did a lot of research, and tried on several. Most of the Italian boots are too narrow for my wide forefoot. Finally, I checked out the world of boots worn by hunters who traverse rugged terrain with heavy loads. Most of these boots are well made, but overbuilt and heavier than I would consider.

After diving into all the options I decided to order the Crispi Thor 2, which is considered "ultralight" among hunting boots. They may be a bit lighter than the Vasque Sundowners I wore back in the 90's, but at 2.5 lbs/pair I don't consider them lightweight. They're offered in regular & wide in European sizes, so I crossed my fingers and ordered the wide and rounded up from my US boot size.

So far I'm very happy with them, but have only worn them on three overnight treks. They have a very stiff sole, but have a decent feel underfoot and a good rocker for striding -- not clunkers at all.

Of course, I wouldn't recommend these expensive boots for the casual day hiker or general use. They're overkill except for backpacking, but worth considering when laden with a pack in rugged terrain.

2naSalit

(94,850 posts)
25. I've been looking for...
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 04:15 PM
Jan 11

A decent pair of hiking boots, any kind, for the past several years. I'm usually disappointed because the boots, when I do find any I like, are often $200+ and I can't always cough that up when shoe shopping.

Martin Eden

(13,739 posts)
28. Hiking boots are an investment. These list for $330, but occasionally go on sale.
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 04:27 PM
Jan 11

Over my years backpacking I've found it makes sense to pay extra for something you like and will use for a long time. I've gone that route with boots, tents, and backpacks. Finding deals while compromising on quality isn't always such a good deal.

Just a caution -- I really haven't put these Crispi boots through real durability testing. If you're willing to go heavier, you may find better durability. My old Vasques lasted longer than the Vibram treads. I'm hoping these Crispis will be the last serious pair of rugged backpacking boots I'll need to buy. I don't use them for anything else, as I have a variety of other hiking footwear -- including trail runners.

Best of luck in your hiking endeavors.

KarenS

(4,764 posts)
5. Birkenstock,,,,,
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 01:08 PM
Jan 11

my favorite brand,,,, I have some really old ones that have been re-soled and a new footbeds put on,,, I guess they aren't doing that anymore (it's a skill I guess that has fallen by the wayside) I have newer Birkies but my 2 favorite pairs are ancient,,,, I use a wheelchair these days so I just wear shoes to cover my feet

Diamond_Dog

(35,695 posts)
9. We used to have a shoe repair shop near me
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 01:26 PM
Jan 11

That guy could fix anything! Shoes, belts, handbags ….. for a very reasonable price, too.

He passed away and so that was that. I miss being able to take favorite shoes in to be repaired.

KT2000

(21,108 posts)
12. Western Chief for boots
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 02:10 PM
Jan 11

Sometimes Costco carries them. I live in NW Washington where it is wet a lot so they were such a good deal I got some for my neighbors and we are all wearing them as our everyday shoes! The fabric top running/walking shoes were too ridiculous for here - feet were always wet!

Skittles

(161,403 posts)
16. NOT BY A LONG SHOT
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 03:30 PM
Jan 11

also I too have noticed that many new shoes I get FAIL TO KEEP RAINWATER FROM SEEPING IN.....it's like, WTF, YOU HAVE ONE FUNCTION

Old Crank

(5,169 posts)
17. I would be happy to have a decent selection.
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 03:30 PM
Jan 11

When I can find shoes my size it feels like a miracle. At 16-17 there isn't much choice. Quality or not. I found a nice medium street walking shoe. Discontinued 2 years later. Most everything is over $100. I buy online. Stores don't have anything.

But yes. I think quality has dropped.

True Dough

(21,537 posts)
20. Whoa! Size 16-17?
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 03:43 PM
Jan 11

Dem's some big feet! But not as challenging as Shaquille O'Neal's size 22s or Andre the Giant's size 24s. I'm guessing those fellas had their footwear custom-made. They have/had the big bucks for it.

rubbersole

(9,016 posts)
23. My son was a ball boy for the Orlando Magic for 10 years.
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 03:52 PM
Jan 11

Joked about being a "ball man" at 21. He has quite the autographed shoe collection. Some pretty big ones, but nothing approaching Shaq's.

TommieMommy

(1,395 posts)
29. Yes when I was working many years ago in retail they lasted a long time.
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 05:03 PM
Jan 11

Now I get anything comfy and reasonable. New Balance and Reebok are not as comfy anymore and pricey.

no_hypocrisy

(49,886 posts)
30. My Thom Mcan sandals from 1978 lasted through my three months in
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 05:05 PM
Jan 11

Europe and have been re-soled once are still sturdy.

SharonClark

(10,391 posts)
31. I find SAS and Hotter work for me.
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 05:32 PM
Jan 11

I used to buy Clarks and wore their sandals for 30 years. About 20 years ago, Clark’s started going downhill and are pretty much unwearable now.

OldBaldy1701E

(7,028 posts)
33. So, I was a land surveyor for almost twelve years.
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 08:09 PM
Jan 11

And, in that time, I wore just about every kind of boot you can imagine, from very expensive boots to the $28 pair from Walmart.

The result is that I am not sure what to tell you. I usually bought the Walmart pair because my work usually destroyed boots regardless of how expensive the boots were. (I even grabbed a pair of combat boots once. They lasted a bit longer than the usual, but you gave up comfort for that extra time. That is an issue when you are hiking around slopes for ten hours a day.) And, depending on where we had to work, the Walmart boots were the best deal because they were usually the lightest to use. I have seen someone show up with boots worth several hundred dollars only to slice one wide open on a bamboo stick the next day just by walking down a trail.

One never knows...

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Is your footwear not last...