Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dougolat

(716 posts)
Sun Dec 25, 2011, 05:55 AM Dec 2011

The shoe is on the other foot....

the 9-11 truthers have the facts and physics on their side, the official story acceptors have naivety and woeful (or willful) ignorance on theirs: Unless one knows about April Gilaspe and Barry Jennings, knows that the put-option investigation evidence was destroyed, grasps the magnitude of testimony the "Commission" muzzled by deeming it classified, has an opinion of the six months of war game rescheduling that focused on the first half of Sept., is aware of happenings at the National Reconnaissance Office that morning, has some familiarity with what was destroyed along with Building 7, has considered which two offices were vaporized in the Pentagon, appreciates the difficulty of bringing down two of the strongest buildings ever built by damaging part of the top 4% of the structural steel, has heard Max Cleland's story, is cognizant of the three white trucks apprehended by the NYPD that morning, and grasps the significance of the 9-11 commissioners statements about how much they are upset about being lied to during the "investigation" and that they considered bringing charges against some of the military brass, for starters, then just what is your certainty based on? The inconceivability? the complexity? the significance ? You are aware that the airport security tapes are missing for just those four flights, right? And the U.S. expedited visas for most of the Saudi "hijackers", right? And the military base addresses for 5 of those guys? P.N.A.C. and the wish for a new "Pearl Harbor" followed by resident W's use of the same phrase in his first speech after the event? How about the Patriot Act, a pre-written part of their wish list? Or the very idea of a military response to a police problem? Or that the mobilization to move on the Middle East started well before September? On October 7,2001 resident W announced the beginning of military action against Afghanistan," because they had provided training-camps"-then misused our military in two wars of aggression, turning two entire countries into vast training camps where we provided !00,000+ targets - and funded both sides! A disaster for everybody except the profiteers, the oil companies, and the power-mad instigators, all aided by the owned media. All coincidence and accident, eh?
Ok, Corbett's not credible -except in comparison to all the other slants, spins, and blindfolds.



Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Whistleblowers»The shoe is on the other ...