Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 09:12 PM Mar 2016

Our Political System Is in the Midst of a Massive Realignment. Here’s How the Left Should Respond.

http://inthesetimes.com/article/18973/bernie-sanders-third-party-working-families-party-realignment-democrats

What the Left needs is an inside/outside electoral strategy vis-à-vis the Democrats.

Inside the Democratic Party, engaged in primary campaigns to push progressive candidates and causes, because current election laws as well as fear of playing the spoiler mean that this is where we must focus out electoral energy for the time being if we are hold together the broadest possible coalition.

But outside in terms of being clearly delineated as something more specific: more critical of capitalism, more independent of corporations and more accountable to its base of supporters than being just another Democrat. And outside in terms of having a real plan to break with the Democrats and become a fully independent third party when the opportunity comes.

Inside/outside electoral strategies have long been incubated in New York state, where the law allows—and political realities demand—that candidates run on multiple ballot lines. Since 1998, the Working Families Party has been the preeminent inside/outside experiment on the Left. The WFP has an impressive track record of endorsing insurgent progressives early and backing them in the Democratic primary, as well as occasionally running a candidate in the general election against the Democratic nominee—a strategy that has put scores of new progressives in office across the state, culminating in the election of NYC Mayor Bill DeBlasio.

The Working Families Party has expanded to five more states plus the District of Columbia, although the inability to run a candidate on more than one ballot line makes the party’s efforts in those places somewhat less visible. In Illinois, unions like SEIU and the Chicago Teachers Union have formed an independent political organization called United Working Families, which supported Jesus “Chuy” Garcia’s insurgent challenge to Rahm Emanuel in Chicago’s technically non-partisan mayoral election. In Vermont, Bernie Sanders’ long run of successful independent runs for office has led to the creation of the Progressive Party, which represents over a dozen local, state and federal offices—a viable third party if ever there was one.
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Our Political System Is in the Midst of a Massive Realignment. Here’s How the Left Should Respond. (Original Post) eridani Mar 2016 OP
I looked them over, Rebkeh Mar 2016 #1
This is what I found eridani Mar 2016 #2
Great, thanks Rebkeh Mar 2016 #3
A Progressive Party. What would that look like? It sounds wonderful, but how pragmatic? libdem4life Mar 2016 #4
There is plenty to do for those preferring the "inside" strategy n/t eridani Mar 2016 #5
I've bookmarked the website...looks very interesting. Thanks. libdem4life Mar 2016 #6
A left party sounds great and I think that it's coming, BUT............ socialist_n_TN Mar 2016 #7
ARe you familiar with Socialist Alternative? eridani Mar 2016 #8
Yep I'm very familiar with SALT........ socialist_n_TN Mar 2016 #9
Right centrist because they do voter contact? eridani Mar 2016 #10

Rebkeh

(2,450 posts)
1. I looked them over,
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 09:17 PM
Mar 2016

The Working Families Party but I couldn't find anything in the way of a platform. Are they working on that?

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
4. A Progressive Party. What would that look like? It sounds wonderful, but how pragmatic?
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 10:07 PM
Mar 2016

But it has to start somewhere.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
7. A left party sounds great and I think that it's coming, BUT............
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 05:28 PM
Mar 2016

as a Bolshevik-Leninist, I don't believe it has much of a shot at a being a long term project unless it's led by the working class. That would be the tide that lifts all boats in alternative politics because a party that focuses on workers' concerns brings the attention to the economic life of the average American. And no, this wouldn't ignore the concerns of especially oppressed minorities either, but we are all oppressed economically.

But the main reason that it should be a workers party is that it would conceivably draw in enough people with the power to actually make a difference in both the inside and outside of the electoral system. Workers withholding labor power and thereby interfering with the profit chain of the owners is the only thing that they will really pay attention to. Add to this outside power, the power of the ballot box, and the owners would finally have a formidable opposition in the United States.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
8. ARe you familiar with Socialist Alternative?
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 01:55 AM
Mar 2016

That's the party that elected Kshama Sawant to the Seattle City Council. In last year's re-election campaign, she had 600 volunteers. The reason that many on the left stay Democrats is that Dems are willing to talk to voters who are not policy wonks, and most third party formations are not. SA is a highly relevant exception. Not sure how long it will take them to get a base beyond urban core aress though.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
9. Yep I'm very familiar with SALT........
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:33 AM
Mar 2016

I even wrote and article on her first run for council offering critical support and then a follow-up a year later on the $15 per hour minimum wage hike. Right centrist organization.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
10. Right centrist because they do voter contact?
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:32 AM
Mar 2016

I find that most socialist factions are more interested in discussing theory with each other than in contacting average non-policy wonk voters. Although it is really unpleasant for committed people to be told stuff like "I'm not voting in the primary because I don't want to read up on so many candidates." One 3/3 voter that I canvassed for as transportation initiative said that she threw her ballot away because she wasn't going to waste a stamp to vote on just one ballot item. People who have informed opinions about the difference between Stalin and Trotsky don't like it much either.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Socialist Progressives»Our Political System Is i...