Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Socialist Progressives
Related: About this forum"What path would world history have taken if Marx had become a Texan?"
This article is a couple of years old, but a great read for Presidents Day.
Lincoln and Marx
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2012/08/lincoln-and-marx/
Abraham Lincoln, as president, chose to reply to an Address from the London-based International Workingmens Association. The Address, drafted by Karl Marx, congratulated Lincoln on his reelection for a second term. In some resonant and complex paragraphs, the Address heralded the world-historical significance of what had become a war against slavery. The Address declared that victory for the North would be a turning point for nineteenth-century politics, an affirmation of free labor, and a defeat for the most reactionary capitalists who depended on slavery and racial oppression.
Lincoln saw only a tiny selection of the avalanche of mail he was sent, employing several secretaries to deal with it. But the US Ambassador in London, Charles Francis Adams, decided to forward the Address to Washington. Encouraging every sign of support for the Union was central to Adamss mission. The Emancipation Proclamation of January 1863 had made this task much easier, but there were still many sections of the British elite who sympathized with the Confederacy and some who favored awarding it diplomatic recognition if only public opinion could be brought to accept this.
The Address carried, beside that of Marx, the signatures of several prominent British trade unionists as well as French socialists and German social democrats. The Ambassador wrote to the IWA, explaining that the president had asked him to convey his response to their Address. He thanked them for their support and expressed his conviction that the defeat of the rebellion would indeed be a victory for the cause of humanity everywhere. He declared that his country would abstain from unlawful intervention but observed that The United States regarded their cause in the present conflict with slavery-maintaining insurgents as the cause of human nature, and they derived new encouragement to persevere from the testimony of the working men of Europe.
Lincoln would have wished to thank British workers, especially those who supported the North despite the distress caused by the Northern blockade and the resulting cotton famine. The appearance of the names of several German revolutionaries would not have surprised him; the defeat of the 1848 revolutions in Europe had swelled the flood of German migrants arriving in North America. At an earlier date in 1843 Marx himself had thought of immigrating to Texas, going so far as to apply to the mayor of Trier, his birthplace, for an immigration permit.
<snip>
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1932 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"What path would world history have taken if Marx had become a Texan?" (Original Post)
Starry Messenger
Feb 2015
OP
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)1. Just a belated K&R.
ctsnowman
(1,903 posts)2. Great read
Thanks.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)3. Another perspective on Marx.
He was a contemporary of our great American historical figure Abraham Lincoln.
In this light, Lincoln said what?
In his first message to Congress in December 1861, Lincoln criticized the effort to place capital on an equal footing with, if not above, labor in the structure of government. Instead, he insisted, labor is prior to and independent of capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor . . . Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)4. This is a great quote and not one that only Lincoln had expressed.
There were others, too. Proudhon was fond of saying something similar.