Socialist Progressives
Related: About this forumRahm Emanuel’s moment of reckoning: How he ended up in a fight for his political life
http://www.salon.com/2015/03/01/rahm_emanuels_moment_of_reckoning_how_he_ended_up_in_a_fight_for_his_political_life/On Tuesday, an earnest, unassuming guy named Chuy Garcia did the unthinkable. He forced Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel into a runoff for election to an office Emanuel thought he purchased outright four years ago. Even better, he did it with the help of United Working Families, a grass-roots movement that with its close cousin, the Working Families Party, is forging a new model of progressive political action. What a week ago seemed a liberal fantasy, Rahms imminent demise, is suddenly a very real possibility.
A Garcia victory would be a historic watershed not just for Chicago or for Democrats but for all progressives. It wouldnt just frighten the Wall Street Dems who now reign over their national party. It would alter the terms of debate even beyond the party and prove, to cynics and to ourselves, that the power of ideas is still greater than the power of money and that grass-roots politics is not dead.
<snip>
Two things about him {Rahm in the White house years} stood out. One was the contempt he heaped on unions and liberals. I thought if he were ever caught on tape it would seriously damage the president and be the end of Rahm. Some later claimed to regard these rants as performance art but even at close range they seemed real enough to me. In any case I never heard him say an unkind word about the rich.
<snip>
The coalition taking Rahm to the mat works off the same model as the Working Families Party and even shares some of its DNA. It includes a dozen unions and community organizations, including the Chicago Teachers Union. Its basic tools are knocking on doorsit hit 153,000 in round oneand calling people up on the phone. Its members are rooted in their community and its message is rooted in its values. It may be about to topple one of the most powerful and least progressive Democrats in the nation. It is exactly seven months old.
<snip>
http://chicagoforchuy.com/campaign_survival_kit.pdf
tularetom
(23,664 posts)You just know he was in Obama's ear every day telling him "Fuck those dirty hippies, you need Wall Street on your side".
If he loses this election it'll scare the shit out of those who want to nominate another DINO as the party's 2016 presidential candidate.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)Obama knew or should have known what Rahm was, so I figure it was exactly what he intended to do.
Now from *my* point of view, oh yeah, it definitely was a mistake....!
tularetom
(23,664 posts)so maybe it wasn't all Emanuel's fault.
Still, the guy gives off a kind of slimy vibe I don't get from the president or most other Democrats.
Joe Lieberman being the most prominent exception.
Starry Messenger
(32,375 posts)There isn't the usual torrent of abuse from the corporate wing. A come to Jesus moment, or just in denial?
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Prosecute the bastard.
Do I mean Cheney or His Nibbs? Why, both, of course.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Treant
(1,968 posts)They think (and off the cuff, I'd say they're probably right) that he'll squeak out a win in the run-off.
forest444
(5,902 posts)Democracy, I believe you already know Mr. Emanuel....
MisterP
(23,730 posts)forest444
(5,902 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)my apprehension, however, is how the "officialists" will handle this: in 2001 they banned voting for third parties, in '06 primaries, in '10 complaining, in '14 not-voting was out of bounds--remember the mighty multibillion abstentionist campaign to convince us that both parties were mostly interested in gaining money and ensuring it for their backers?
forest444
(5,902 posts)I'm not from Chicago (although I lived in Michigan in the late '90s, and have fond memories of hours spent walking around Lake View, the Loop, and the Lakeshore area). But my guess is that Emanuel will pull out all the procedural stops on this one (and then some). His problem seems to be that he feels so entitled - the very cause of his possible undoing, as irony would have it.
And there's another problem with that strategy, as far as Emanuel's concerned: García's charisma. All things being equal, few things beat charisma not only as a political asset in itself, of course; but also as a motivator for voter turnout.
I have nothing against Mayor Emanuel; I don't care if he was a lobbyist, if he's a Third-Way DINO, if he's gay, or what have you. When he won the first time around, I felt happy for Obama; as it's common knowledge the two are close friends, Emanuel's victory must have been a nice consolation price for the president coming so soon after the 2010 tea bag shellacking.
But the minute I learned Hizzoner was closing 54 public schools in already desperately poor and underserved areas, and that he was doing so because he was being advised to do so by sworn enemies of public education like the Eli Broad Academy goons, that did it. If I lived in Chicago, I'd be hard pressed to support someone like that.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)Plan for Chicago ?
Starry Messenger
(32,375 posts)The Wizard
(12,868 posts)I'm sure he understands why turning on the base is a bad idea.
nikto
(3,284 posts)To clearly show what's wrong with neoliberalism, just study Rahm.
Corporate tool, anti-union, pro-privatization, crony-capitalist, pro 1%/screw-the-99%, openly anti-liberal.
Milton Friedman would be proud of Rahm.
Decent Americans should be ashamed.
Joe Shlabotnik
(5,604 posts)And Dems who like or support him, should maybe do some soul searching.
nikto
(3,284 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)Hmm.... there's something a foot here.