Socialist Progressives
Related: About this forumCan the working class still change the world?
Kyle Brown ~ April 14, 2015
IN HIS famous speech "Where Do We Go From Here?" Martin Luther King Jr. quoted the then-president of the United Auto Workers (UAW) union, Walter Reuther, saying, "Power is the ability of a labor union like the UAW to make the most powerful corporation in the world, General Motors, say 'Yes' when it wants to say 'No.'"
This question of power continues to be posed for activists today. Where does the power lie to defend the Occupy encampments and the movement when the most powerful state in the world decides to carry out repression? Where does the power lie for the Black Lives Matter movement to actually realize the popular chant "shut it down" in order to win some of its demands for justice?
With labor unions and strike action at historic lows today, it's understandable that few people immediately think of the working class as the answer to those questions.
But contrary to the popular view, held even among people on the left, the vast social changes that have taken place since King's time and before haven't eliminated the potential of the working class as the key social force able to transform society and pose a radical alternative to capitalism. In fact, the working class is still, as Karl Marx and Frederick Engels put it in The Communist Manifesto more than 160 years ago, capitalism's potential "gravediggers." ...
More here: http://socialistworker.org/2015/04/14/can-workers-still-change-the-world
daleanime
(17,796 posts)guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)The 1% may be greedy, unscrupulous, and undemocratic in instinct and action, but they are not stupid. They were caught unaware by the protests and social movements of the 1960s but they recovered quickly. They are used to controlling, and once they figured out the proper methods they implemented their plans.
The 1% knows that whoever controls the narrative controls the argument. In any debate, the person who can best frame the issues will generally control the debate. The GOP may be terrible at actually governing for the benefit of most, but they know how to frame their ideas as acceptable to people.
The success at framing an estate tax that affects only the richest 1/10th of 1% as a "death tax", with the implication that every American family will be affected by it, is only one example.
Framing massive, structural income inequality as a natural and inevitable consequence of American life is another.
Starting in the 1960s, the GOP founded and funded many think tanks to present so-called objective analysis of issues that just happened to support what was most beneficial to the rich. How many people know that the Cato Institute actually started out as the Koch Institute?
The 99% does not have the money, but, at least for now, we have the votes. If we do not vote, the minority who do will continue to have a disproportionate influence on politics.
That said, HOW do we motivate people?
eridani
(51,907 posts)--still have a working class in the traditional sense. In the developed world, technological unemployment is proceeding apace, and it's the superfluous who will have to be the change engine.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)The answer to your question, then, is "Yes we can!"
TBF
(34,315 posts)are the working class. WE are the working class. If you aren't parking your boat within your yacht, you are not in the top .01% - you are with US.