Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 01:13 AM Apr 2015

How American Socialists Fought for Labor Using Control over Local Government

ballot“Socialist administrations were most often elected in small or medium-sized railroad, mining, or industrial centers. Where the worker was not a worker or trade unionist himself, others in the administration often were. In Butte, Montana, the Socialist mayor was a minister; the police judge and city treasurer elected with him in 1911 were miners. In Lackawanna, New York where a socialist mayor (occupation unknown) was elected in 1919, the two Socialist councilmen were trade unionists. Similarly in Davenport, Iowa, which elected a Socialist doctor to the mayoralty in 1920, the Socialist city clerk was a machinist.

“Actively pro-labor, these Socialist administrations aided unions in many ways. One of the first acts of the Socialist mayor of Eureka, Utah, for example, had been to arrest and fine a Pinkerton man for carrying a concealed weapon. More substantial was the approach of Marshall E. Kirkpatrick, Socialist mayor of Granite, Illinois (1911, 1913, 1917), a railroad and metal-processing suburb of St. Louis. During strikes, Kirkland wrote, the city administration could not be neutral; true to his Socialist principles, he supported the workers. This could almost always be done by using the police power to allow a ‘fair fight.’ When three hundred metal workers struck, Kirkpatrick followed his own advice and refused a company request for running scabs through a picket line. Similarly, during the Paterson textile strike of 1913, when IWW strikers were refused permission to speak in Paterson, the Socialist mayor of nearby Haledon invited the workers to hold their meetings on his territory. And during the IWW strike in Little Falls, New York, [Socialist] Mayor [George R.] Lunn of Schenectady [New York] helped organize a relief committee to supply the nearby strikes with money, food, and clothing. For this, Bill Haywood praised the Lunn administration and noted that the strikers ‘deeply appreciated’ what these right-wing Socialists had done, even though they could not vote Socialist, ‘as most of them were women and children.’ Finally, in 1917, the Socialist Mayor of Camas, Washington, appointed two strikers at Crown Paper as special deputies, and thereby lost his own job at the mills.”


https://revolutionaryds.wordpress.com/2015/04/21/how-american-socialists-used-local-government-to-labor/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How American Socialists Fought for Labor Using Control over Local Government (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter Apr 2015 OP
I am a lot more optimistic about working local than I am about the kabuki in D.C. merrily Apr 2015 #1
Milwaukee has a rich history of Socialism. postulater Apr 2015 #2
I'm convinced the proximity to Chicago TBF Apr 2015 #3
Now this is interesting - TBF Apr 2015 #4

merrily

(45,251 posts)
1. I am a lot more optimistic about working local than I am about the kabuki in D.C.
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 02:25 AM
Apr 2015

Then again, I live in a blue city in a blue state.

TBF

(34,315 posts)
3. I'm convinced the proximity to Chicago
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 01:53 PM
Apr 2015

is the thing that helped us. I grew up in mid-Wisconsin in the 70s. Folks worked in both small and larger factories and they belonged to the unions. They were serious about organizing - and I think that came straight from the strong labor tradition in Chicago. Now all of that has been outsourced or weakened. Along with it the salaries that could actually support a family.

I look at folks there now, in their 20's-40s, working at Walmart, McDonalds, etc ... and think about how we tried to warn them. Instead they elected Scott Walker. Smh ...



TBF

(34,315 posts)
4. Now this is interesting -
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 01:56 PM
Apr 2015

because in my experience it definitely fanned out from Milwaukee. Maybe not to the farmers (although many of them voted based on subsidies alone!) but definitely to the working class in the small towns.

Shepherd: Why did the Socialists take root in Milwaukee and not other parts of the state?

Gurda: The background is that you have a couple factors. You have a huge German population and a number of Germans who came here had fled a failed revolt in 1848. So there was at least a kind of intellectual seedbed for leftist ideas. People had read Marx and Lassalle. The Turners, who go way back to the mid-1800s, they were a Socialist organization in the early years. So you have the German intellectual tradition here, and you've got a huge working-class population, so you had a great deal of receptiveness to appeals to class consciousness. You have the shootings of 1886, when at least five demonstrators were shot dead by the state militia marching for the eight-hour workday. The voters did not forget that event. Then you had a guy named Victor Berger, who becomes kind of the presiding genius of the Socialist movement in Milwaukee. You put all of these things together and it was a city ripe for reform.


Anyway, very interesting article, thanks for posting.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Socialist Progressives»How American Socialists F...