Photography
Related: About this forumEasterncedar
(3,636 posts)It makes me want, for the first time, to learn the names of all those features I can see so clearly now. Thanks for the wonderful sight!
Mousetoescamper
(5,466 posts)riverbendviewgal
(4,325 posts)Such an awesome photo. Than you for sharing.
Mousetoescamper
(5,466 posts)KS Toronado
(19,694 posts)Mousetoescamper
(5,466 posts)John1956PA
(3,422 posts)Is the image rotated ninety degrees clockwise?
Mousetoescamper
(5,466 posts)The image isn't rotated.
John1956PA
(3,422 posts)The discrepancy in rotation between the two images seems to be 90 degrees.
Mousetoescamper
(5,466 posts)My photo was taken at 12:13 AM today.
John1956PA
(3,422 posts)The orientation of the lunarscape in my photo is about 45 degrees counterclockwise from the orientation shown in the above image from Fourmilab. I think that the Fourmilab image shows the moon as it appeared on midnight on December 12.
Mousetoescamper
(5,466 posts)What's your point with this exercise? What do you require?
CaliforniaPeggy
(152,382 posts)Words fail me.
I've never seen the moon at this angle before. It looks so spherical, so luminous. I am gobsmacked!
Mousetoescamper
(5,466 posts)The sky was clear and the moon was nearly full (coming Dec. 15). I don't usually try to shoot this phase because it lacks the shadows that make the craters and mountains pop. As an experiment I matched the exposure time to the ISO. The photo turned out better than expected.
ISO 100 (my usual setting for the moon)
f16
1/100 sec