TV Chat
Related: About this forumRalph Kramden's salary
Ralph: Quiet, I don't want my salary to leak out.
Alice: You're salary couldn't drip out.
_
OK, I know it's a work of fiction, but it always bugs me when something doesn't quite fit. Ralph was a NY bus driver, so why were they living in squalor? We're they paid that badly back then?
I seem to recall that the bus company was a private business, and not a city job with a union. That doesn't explain why Ed was also living in the same building. He had a government job. We're they paid that badly?
Sanity Claws
(22,056 posts)He also had enough money to belong to a lodge and go bowling regularly. Clearly they had some disposable income.
I don't think that they lived in squalor. People lived a lot more modestly in the 1950s. The Kramdens had a one-bedroom apartment and most apartments at the time had exterior fire escapes.
As for the Nortons, their apartment was nicer. I did some research after my initial post and found this, https://eyesofageneration.com/welcome-to-the-ed-norton-apartment-this-great-color-photo-was-taken-in-april/
Yes, the Nortons clearly had a nicer apartment. I also remember that they got a television before the Kramdens did.
mahina
(19,006 posts)snowybirdie
(5,676 posts)Probably based on Gleason's actual childhood apartment. His Dad left home when he was a child and his mom was a drinker.
PSPS
(14,188 posts)Both Ralph and "Norton" (Art Carney) were paid $62 per week. Gleason decided to portray the family as relatively poor when The Honeymooners was a radio show and he based it on the then-popular radio show, "The Bickersons," which used the same device as a better foundation for comedy.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)and the Bickerson's were always arguing about money.
Cartoonist
(7,557 posts)I've only heard about 10 episodes.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)and lack of money and Mobility,the snore was the hook in the dialogue. So many Sitcom's came from this type of monologue,people during the Forties could relate. And after WW2,the first three years were a mess for tons of folks. And the Radio Soap Opra's and Situation Comedies were the rage.
Three Generations living in a three bedroom House was kind of the norm,oh and many did not have Electricity or indoor plumbing during this time in our History. This was the beginning of the mass migration to the Cities as well,were modern conveniences was the norm. And Gleason and his writers had years of Historical References to work with.
PSPS
(14,188 posts)There's no doubt about his talent. He really struck gold when he inked his CBS contract and became a legendary icon. But before then, even before his "Life of Riley" show on NBC, he tried to make it as a movie star. That didn't work out, but his few movie appearances back then demonstrate his instinct for comedic timing. One example is his small role in "Larceny, Inc.," with Edward G Robinson. In this hilarious movie, a 25-year-old Gleason plays the role of a soda jerk.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)Think of all those Second City and Saturday Night folks who copied the Soda Jerk role.
Jane Austin
(9,199 posts)I remember William Bendix as Riley, but not Gleason.
PSPS
(14,188 posts)"Life of Riley" had its first incarnation (only 26 episodes) in the 1949-1950 season (sponsor Pabst Beer canceled.) Bendix was working on the film version and was unable to work on this. Later, in 1953, the series was revived with Bendix and it ran for six seasons. Most, if not all, of the episodes in syndication are from the Bendix run.
Jane Austin
(9,199 posts)I missed the first incarnation.
Mister Ed
(6,372 posts)It's fifty years since, as a young boy, I happened to see a rerun episode in which, in the heat of an argument, Alice tried to humiliate Ralph by shouting that figure out the window while he tried frantically to shush her.
I guess memory is off, then? I always thought I remembered her shouting, "$84 a week!".
3Hotdogs
(13,502 posts)Queens.
mahina
(19,006 posts)delisen
(6,556 posts)The had modest salaries and pensions plans which were supposed to make up for the modest salaries.
Over time their salaries increased at a faster rate than those of private companies and their pension plans were better than those of private companies. many municipal employees were able to retire at much younger ages than private company employees.