Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
TV Chat
Related: About this forumJennifer Aniston and Mark Hamill couldn't save 'The Kids Are Alright'
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
It hasn't been all bad news for the McCormack clan though. Seven years ago some of the West Wing cast reunited to shoot a campaign ad for Mary's sister. She won and has since risen to Chief Justice of the Michigan Supreme Court...
https://www.democraticunderground.com/101759691
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jennifer Aniston and Mark Hamill couldn't save 'The Kids Are Alright' (Original Post)
LessAspin
Aug 2019
OP
The one that re-directs my brain away from the talker is "That's not the point."
NBachers
Aug 2019
#3
Glorfindel
(10,034 posts)1. As much as I love Jennifer Aniston and Mark Hamill, any show with "Alright"
in its title does not deserve to be saved. There is no such word, nor should there be. It's right up there with "irregardless" in the list of repulsive, useless would-be words.
MontanaMama
(24,211 posts)2. Irregardless is a personal
pet peeve of mine. When I hear it, my brain shuts down.
NBachers
(18,252 posts)3. The one that re-directs my brain away from the talker is "That's not the point."
Dagstead Bumwood
(5,263 posts)4. Damn shame.
It's a good show and worthy of saving. I mean, if that awful Tim Allen dreck can be rescued, then a funny, thoughtful show like this deserves a network home.