Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
California
Related: About this forumCalifornia study shows that small cells actually increase home values. Uh, not so fast.
What they mean is, in an inverse kind of a way. The farther you are from a 5G antenna, the more your house's value goes up.
California study shows that small cells actually increase home values
In Featured News by Wireless Estimator July 23, 2021
Joint Venture Silicon Valley unveiled their latest study last week regarding the Economic Impacts to Residential Real Estate from Small Wireless Facilities.
The study focused on whether objective evidence in real estate sales records shows residential real estate valuation impacts from small wireless facilities or small cells.
It concluded that small cell facilities do not have an appreciable effect on nearby property valuations and the oft-cited 20% reductions in valuation were not evident in their California state-wide analysis, nor in any of the metropolitan region analyses.
In fact, the report notes that statewide, real estate valuation increases from proximal wireless sites ranged from +0.03% (within 0.06 miles of a new wireless site) to +2.14% (at distances from 5.2 miles to 5.5 miles).
For purposes of illustration, the report said, Californias median single-family home price in 2020 was $758,990, therefore valuation increases ranged from $228 (0.03%) to $16,242 (2.14%).
{snip}
In Featured News by Wireless Estimator July 23, 2021
Joint Venture Silicon Valley unveiled their latest study last week regarding the Economic Impacts to Residential Real Estate from Small Wireless Facilities.
The study focused on whether objective evidence in real estate sales records shows residential real estate valuation impacts from small wireless facilities or small cells.
It concluded that small cell facilities do not have an appreciable effect on nearby property valuations and the oft-cited 20% reductions in valuation were not evident in their California state-wide analysis, nor in any of the metropolitan region analyses.
In fact, the report notes that statewide, real estate valuation increases from proximal wireless sites ranged from +0.03% (within 0.06 miles of a new wireless site) to +2.14% (at distances from 5.2 miles to 5.5 miles).
For purposes of illustration, the report said, Californias median single-family home price in 2020 was $758,990, therefore valuation increases ranged from $228 (0.03%) to $16,242 (2.14%).
{snip}
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1572 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California study shows that small cells actually increase home values. Uh, not so fast. (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2021
OP
brush
(57,650 posts)1. Why would small cell facilities have any impact on houses when most have...
never heard of small cells...or large cells for that matter?
Auggie
(31,807 posts)3. I'll guess that some realtors are using this as a selling tool
It could be of importance to some buyers, just like "a good school system" or "proximity to shopping."
chia
(2,379 posts)2. Multiple home sales amongst family in CA the last few years - never once has 'small cell' been part
of the decision process.