California
Related: About this forumPoll shows Newsom with wide lead over GOP challenger, State Sen. Brian Dahle
California Governor Gavin Newsom holds a wide lead in his bid for re-election over Republican challenger, State Senator Brian Dahle, according to a new poll from the Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies.
The poll asked voters their preference for governor in the fall general election. Newsom leads Dahle by a margin of 52% to 25%. Newsom also leads Dahle by 24-points among people considered most likely to vote in the election (55%-31%).
Approval ratings in the poll found that 53% of the states voters approve of the job that Newsom is doing, while 42% disapprove. However, despite the positive approval rating, voters continue to believe that California is moving in the wrong direction by a margin of 52% to 40%.
https://ktla.com/news/poll-shows-newsom-with-wide-lead-over-gop-challenger-state-sen-brian-dahle/
The Unmitigated Gall
(4,523 posts)About where California is going
do I think for one Planck-length of time that a republiscum can responsibly address those concerns?
Fuck no
theyre arsonists on the best of days, terrorists on the worst.
SunSeeker
(53,669 posts)Auggie
(31,802 posts)From the San Francisco Chronicle, August 22, 2022 (paywall)
Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed a bill that would have allowed pilot programs where people could use drugs under the supervision of trained staff in San Francisco, Oakland and Los Angeles, a blow to a long-fought battle to tackle the cities overdose crises.
In his veto letter, Newsom said the unlimited number of sites the legislation would have allowed could induce unintended consequences, mentioning worsening drug consumption challenges. He directed his Health and Human Services secretary and local officials to come back to the Legislature with detailed plans for a truly limited pilot program.
The most recent veto is a setback for many San Francisco officials who have pushed to open these sites for years to curb overdose deaths, but have held off because federal law still prohibits them and state law doesnt provide protections for medical providers running the sites. But San Francisco could still move forward with opening a site after City Attorney David Chiu released a statement following Newsoms veto that said he would support a nonprofit opening a site.
LINK: https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Gov-Newsom-vetoes-bill-allowing-supervised-drug-17390653.php
He may have lost some votes (not mine, btw).
onecaliberal
(35,835 posts)There was no solid plan.
Newsom said the unlimited number of sites the legislation would have allowed could induce unintended consequences, mentioning worsening drug consumption challenges.
Auggie
(31,802 posts)onecaliberal
(35,835 posts)The Governor not wanting to make more addicts.
Auggie
(31,802 posts)onecaliberal
(35,835 posts)SunSeeker
(53,669 posts)As your article notes, federal law still prohibits these drug use centers and state law doesnt provide protections for medical providers running the sites.
It will not affect his poll numbers. If anything, it might help them with the folks who are complaining about crime and drug use in their neighborhoods. CA is well known for its NIMBYs, and there are very few people who would want "supervised drug use centers" in their neighborhoods.