Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SunSeeker

(53,669 posts)
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 04:57 PM Aug 2022

Poll shows Newsom with wide lead over GOP challenger, State Sen. Brian Dahle

California Governor Gavin Newsom holds a wide lead in his bid for re-election over Republican challenger, State Senator Brian Dahle, according to a new poll from the Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies.

The poll asked voters their preference for governor in the fall general election. Newsom leads Dahle by a margin of 52% to 25%. Newsom also leads Dahle by 24-points among people considered most likely to vote in the election (55%-31%).

Approval ratings in the poll found that 53% of the state’s voters approve of the job that Newsom is doing, while 42% disapprove. However, despite the positive approval rating, voters continue to believe that California is moving in the wrong direction by a margin of 52% to 40%.

https://ktla.com/news/poll-shows-newsom-with-wide-lead-over-gop-challenger-state-sen-brian-dahle/

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Poll shows Newsom with wide lead over GOP challenger, State Sen. Brian Dahle (Original Post) SunSeeker Aug 2022 OP
Well shit, I have concerns The Unmitigated Gall Aug 2022 #1
Exactly. nt SunSeeker Aug 2022 #9
Was this poll taken before his supervised drug site veto? Auggie Aug 2022 #2
Read about why he vetoed. He is worried about it making things worse. onecaliberal Aug 2022 #3
Of course I read it. That's why I said I agreed with his veto. Auggie Aug 2022 #4
Then I'm not sure how anyone could be upset by onecaliberal Aug 2022 #5
There are upset people in The Bay Area Auggie Aug 2022 #6
They should go see what LA looks like. It could be them if the drug use proliferated with funding. onecaliberal Aug 2022 #7
His veto was not particularly controversial or unexpected. SunSeeker Aug 2022 #8

The Unmitigated Gall

(4,523 posts)
1. Well shit, I have concerns
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 05:23 PM
Aug 2022

About where California is going…do I think for one Planck-length of time that a republiscum can responsibly address those concerns?

Fuck no… they’re arsonists on the best of days, terrorists on the worst.

Auggie

(31,802 posts)
2. Was this poll taken before his supervised drug site veto?
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 05:25 PM
Aug 2022

From the San Francisco Chronicle, August 22, 2022 (paywall)

Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed a bill that would have allowed pilot programs where people could use drugs under the supervision of trained staff in San Francisco, Oakland and Los Angeles, a blow to a long-fought battle to tackle the cities’ overdose crises.

In his veto letter, Newsom said the unlimited number of sites the legislation would have allowed could induce “unintended consequences,” mentioning “worsening drug consumption challenges.” He directed his Health and Human Services secretary and local officials to come back to the Legislature with detailed plans for a “truly limited pilot program.”

The most recent veto is a setback for many San Francisco officials who have pushed to open these sites for years to curb overdose deaths, but have held off because federal law still prohibits them and state law doesn’t provide protections for medical providers running the sites. But San Francisco could still move forward with opening a site after City Attorney David Chiu released a statement following Newsom’s veto that said he would support a nonprofit opening a site.

LINK: https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Gov-Newsom-vetoes-bill-allowing-supervised-drug-17390653.php

He may have lost some votes (not mine, btw).

onecaliberal

(35,835 posts)
3. Read about why he vetoed. He is worried about it making things worse.
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 05:57 PM
Aug 2022

There was no solid plan.

Newsom said the unlimited number of sites the legislation would have allowed could induce “unintended consequences,” mentioning “worsening drug consumption challenges.”

SunSeeker

(53,669 posts)
8. His veto was not particularly controversial or unexpected.
Tue Aug 23, 2022, 10:21 PM
Aug 2022

As your article notes, federal law still prohibits these drug use centers and state law doesn’t provide protections for medical providers running the sites. 

It will not affect his poll numbers. If anything, it might help them with the folks who are complaining about crime and drug use in their neighborhoods. CA is well known for its NIMBYs, and there are very few people who would want "supervised drug use centers" in their neighborhoods.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»Poll shows Newsom with wi...