Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Auggie

(31,775 posts)
Wed Sep 21, 2022, 07:49 AM Sep 2022

California Democratic Party / Official Nov 8 2022 State Proposition Endorsements

https://cadem.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/CADEM-Prop-Updated_2.pdf

1) Yes -- Places fundamental right to abortion & the right to contraceptives in the CA Constitution

26) Neutral -- Authorizes new types of gambling.

27) No -- Out-of-state corps. take 90% of money. No real CA investment or jobs. 50+ CA tribes oppose

28) Yes -- Ensures ALL students in public schools get arts and music education – without raising taxes

29) Yes -- Protects dialysis patients by increasing clinic safety measures

30) Yes -- Prevents wildfires and reduces tailpipe pollution. Lower climate emissions, cleaner air

31) Yes -- Protects kids from Big Tobacco by ending the sale of candy-flavored tobacco and menthols

Board of Equalization endorsements: https://cadem.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/2022-CADEM-General-Endorsements.pdf

Homepage link: https://cadem.org/endorsements/



10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California Democratic Party / Official Nov 8 2022 State Proposition Endorsements (Original Post) Auggie Sep 2022 OP
????? on Prop 26 ...... Lovie777 Sep 2022 #1
I'm curious also ... Auggie Sep 2022 #2
29) Protects dialysis patients: Expenditures quaint Sep 2022 #3
The money opponents have spent to defeat these props ... Auggie Sep 2022 #4
A boatload of money Brother Buzz Sep 2022 #10
I'm NO on both 26 and 27. quaint Sep 2022 #5
I'm voting yes on 26, no on 27 Beatlelvr Sep 2022 #6
Prop 30, What would it do? quaint Sep 2022 #7
Prop 30: Why mayors of SJ, Oakland and Newsom are on opposite sides of the EV ballot measure quaint Sep 2022 #9
26 is also bad for native american interests. roody Sep 2022 #8

quaint

(3,509 posts)
3. 29) Protects dialysis patients: Expenditures
Wed Sep 21, 2022, 08:59 AM
Sep 2022
From CalMatters

A total of $86.3M has been invested in this race. There haven't been any independent expenditures, yet. Independent expenditures are when companies and organizations spend to support or oppose campaigns. There are no spending limits.

The last time we checked for new data was September 20 at 5:40 PM.

OPPONENTS have raised $86.3M (No independent expenditures)
SUPPORTERS have raised $0 (No independent expenditures)

This is so telling. Third time on the ballot and their unlimited funds haven't fooled us yet.

Auggie

(31,775 posts)
4. The money opponents have spent to defeat these props ...
Wed Sep 21, 2022, 09:04 AM
Sep 2022

would go a long way towards helping dialysis patients.

Brother Buzz

(37,721 posts)
10. A boatload of money
Mon Sep 26, 2022, 12:07 PM
Sep 2022

The YouTube is deluged with their ads, tugging the heartstrings, and I just received the mailer.

quaint

(3,509 posts)
5. I'm NO on both 26 and 27.
Wed Sep 21, 2022, 09:10 AM
Sep 2022

CalMatters
Here’s what each initiative does

The “California Sports Wagering Regulation and Unlawful Gambling Enforcement Act” {26} is backed by a group of Native American tribes and is currently eligible for the ballot. It would allow tribal casinos and the state’s four horse race tracks to offer sports betting. It would also allow tribal casinos to expand their gambling offerings to roulette and dice games.

Meanwhile, the “California Solutions to Homelessness and Mental Health Act” {27} is backed by several large sports betting companies, including FanDuel, DraftKings, and BetMGM. It would legalize online sports betting outside of Native American lands, and allow gaming companies to offer online sports betting if they partner with a tribe. Election officials are reviewing the signatures for this initiative — if enough are valid, it too will be eligible for the ballot.

Your guide to sports betting and everything else to know about gambling in California
Lots of good information.

NO on 27
More good information.

Beatlelvr

(671 posts)
6. I'm voting yes on 26, no on 27
Wed Sep 21, 2022, 09:27 AM
Sep 2022

But curious about 30. I think gov. Newsom has done some No on 30 tv spots.

quaint

(3,509 posts)
7. Prop 30, What would it do?
Thu Sep 22, 2022, 08:38 AM
Sep 2022

From CalMatters (lots more on this proposition there).


Prop. 30 would impose a 1.75% personal income tax increase on Californians making more than $2 million per year to fund a suite of climate programs. The goal is to clean up the state’s dirty air and help meet ambitious greenhouse gas reduction targets.

The proposition creates a new revenue stream to subsidize zero-emission vehicles and fund wildfire response and prevention — between $3.5 billion to $5 billion annually, growing over time, according to state analysts.

Most of the money — about 80% — would go towards rebates for people buying zero-emission cars and to build more charging stations. Half of that funding will go to low- and middle-income residents, who are disproportionately affected by poor air quality and heavy pollution. The state already spends millions each year on zero-emission vehicle programs and dedicated an additional $10 billion over the next five years to those programs in this year’s budget.

A quarter of the tax money would provide funding to hire and train firefighters, who are battling increasingly worsening wildfires. On average, the state spends about $2 billion to $4 billion annually putting out wildfires.

The tax would go into effect in January 2023 and would end by January 2043, or possibly earlier, if the state is able to slash its emissions to at least 80% below 1990 levels for three consecutive calendar years.

quaint

(3,509 posts)
9. Prop 30: Why mayors of SJ, Oakland and Newsom are on opposite sides of the EV ballot measure
Fri Sep 23, 2022, 05:15 PM
Sep 2022
ABC7News September 20

One of the biggest financial contributors to Prop 30 is rideshare company Lyft who has poured millions into it.

Though Prop 30 has received backing from the California Democratic Party, it's also opposed by the California Republican Party and other groups.

They say Lyft is trying to get taxpayers to help them meet a state mandate to eventually electrify their fleet.

"It's a big tax increase that disproportionately benefits, a few large corporations," Newsom said, "There was one large corporation, wonderful company, that's going to be one of the lion's share beneficiaries of raising everybody else's taxes to direct money in an area where we just passed the largest appropriation and the largest budget in U.S. history." Newsome quote




Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»California Democratic Par...