Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
California
Related: About this forumCalifornia Democratic Party / Official Nov 8 2022 State Proposition Endorsements
https://cadem.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/CADEM-Prop-Updated_2.pdf1) Yes -- Places fundamental right to abortion & the right to contraceptives in the CA Constitution
26) Neutral -- Authorizes new types of gambling.
27) No -- Out-of-state corps. take 90% of money. No real CA investment or jobs. 50+ CA tribes oppose
28) Yes -- Ensures ALL students in public schools get arts and music education without raising taxes
29) Yes -- Protects dialysis patients by increasing clinic safety measures
30) Yes -- Prevents wildfires and reduces tailpipe pollution. Lower climate emissions, cleaner air
31) Yes -- Protects kids from Big Tobacco by ending the sale of candy-flavored tobacco and menthols
Board of Equalization endorsements: https://cadem.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/2022-CADEM-General-Endorsements.pdf
Homepage link: https://cadem.org/endorsements/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 2184 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California Democratic Party / Official Nov 8 2022 State Proposition Endorsements (Original Post)
Auggie
Sep 2022
OP
Lovie777
(14,897 posts)1. ????? on Prop 26 ......
Auggie
(31,775 posts)2. I'm curious also ...
but I've decided to vote NO on 26.
quaint
(3,509 posts)3. 29) Protects dialysis patients: Expenditures
From CalMatters
A total of $86.3M has been invested in this race. There haven't been any independent expenditures, yet. Independent expenditures are when companies and organizations spend to support or oppose campaigns. There are no spending limits.
The last time we checked for new data was September 20 at 5:40 PM.
OPPONENTS have raised $86.3M (No independent expenditures)
SUPPORTERS have raised $0 (No independent expenditures)
This is so telling. Third time on the ballot and their unlimited funds haven't fooled us yet.
A total of $86.3M has been invested in this race. There haven't been any independent expenditures, yet. Independent expenditures are when companies and organizations spend to support or oppose campaigns. There are no spending limits.
The last time we checked for new data was September 20 at 5:40 PM.
OPPONENTS have raised $86.3M (No independent expenditures)
SUPPORTERS have raised $0 (No independent expenditures)
This is so telling. Third time on the ballot and their unlimited funds haven't fooled us yet.
Auggie
(31,775 posts)4. The money opponents have spent to defeat these props ...
would go a long way towards helping dialysis patients.
Brother Buzz
(37,721 posts)10. A boatload of money
The YouTube is deluged with their ads, tugging the heartstrings, and I just received the mailer.
quaint
(3,509 posts)5. I'm NO on both 26 and 27.
CalMatters
Heres what each initiative does
The California Sports Wagering Regulation and Unlawful Gambling Enforcement Act {26} is backed by a group of Native American tribes and is currently eligible for the ballot. It would allow tribal casinos and the states four horse race tracks to offer sports betting. It would also allow tribal casinos to expand their gambling offerings to roulette and dice games.
Meanwhile, the California Solutions to Homelessness and Mental Health Act {27} is backed by several large sports betting companies, including FanDuel, DraftKings, and BetMGM. It would legalize online sports betting outside of Native American lands, and allow gaming companies to offer online sports betting if they partner with a tribe. Election officials are reviewing the signatures for this initiative if enough are valid, it too will be eligible for the ballot.
Meanwhile, the California Solutions to Homelessness and Mental Health Act {27} is backed by several large sports betting companies, including FanDuel, DraftKings, and BetMGM. It would legalize online sports betting outside of Native American lands, and allow gaming companies to offer online sports betting if they partner with a tribe. Election officials are reviewing the signatures for this initiative if enough are valid, it too will be eligible for the ballot.
Your guide to sports betting and everything else to know about gambling in California
Lots of good information.
NO on 27
More good information.
Beatlelvr
(671 posts)6. I'm voting yes on 26, no on 27
But curious about 30. I think gov. Newsom has done some No on 30 tv spots.
quaint
(3,509 posts)7. Prop 30, What would it do?
From CalMatters (lots more on this proposition there).
Prop. 30 would impose a 1.75% personal income tax increase on Californians making more than $2 million per year to fund a suite of climate programs. The goal is to clean up the states dirty air and help meet ambitious greenhouse gas reduction targets.
The proposition creates a new revenue stream to subsidize zero-emission vehicles and fund wildfire response and prevention between $3.5 billion to $5 billion annually, growing over time, according to state analysts.
Most of the money about 80% would go towards rebates for people buying zero-emission cars and to build more charging stations. Half of that funding will go to low- and middle-income residents, who are disproportionately affected by poor air quality and heavy pollution. The state already spends millions each year on zero-emission vehicle programs and dedicated an additional $10 billion over the next five years to those programs in this years budget.
A quarter of the tax money would provide funding to hire and train firefighters, who are battling increasingly worsening wildfires. On average, the state spends about $2 billion to $4 billion annually putting out wildfires.
The tax would go into effect in January 2023 and would end by January 2043, or possibly earlier, if the state is able to slash its emissions to at least 80% below 1990 levels for three consecutive calendar years.
quaint
(3,509 posts)9. Prop 30: Why mayors of SJ, Oakland and Newsom are on opposite sides of the EV ballot measure
ABC7News September 20
One of the biggest financial contributors to Prop 30 is rideshare company Lyft who has poured millions into it.
Though Prop 30 has received backing from the California Democratic Party, it's also opposed by the California Republican Party and other groups.
They say Lyft is trying to get taxpayers to help them meet a state mandate to eventually electrify their fleet.
Though Prop 30 has received backing from the California Democratic Party, it's also opposed by the California Republican Party and other groups.
They say Lyft is trying to get taxpayers to help them meet a state mandate to eventually electrify their fleet.
"It's a big tax increase that disproportionately benefits, a few large corporations," Newsom said, "There was one large corporation, wonderful company, that's going to be one of the lion's share beneficiaries of raising everybody else's taxes to direct money in an area where we just passed the largest appropriation and the largest budget in U.S. history." Newsome quote
roody
(10,849 posts)8. 26 is also bad for native american interests.