Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
California
Related: About this forumThe fight over California community solar: 'It's everyone vs. utilities'
https://www.canarymedia.com/articles/solar/the-fight-over-california-community-solar-everyone-vs-the-utilitiesLots here. Im just quoting some paragraphs that distinguish this from the recent PUC ruling.
If adopted, the NVBT could also ensure that the potential money-saving benefits of solar are not put even further out of reach for lower-income households and disadvantaged communities. Changes to rooftop-solar policy that went into effect earlier this year have already weakened the economics of rooftop solar in the state and made it harder to afford.
AB 2316 requires that low- and moderate-income households make up at least 51 percent of a community solar projects subscribers. The coalition behind the NVBT has pledged to structure payments to these households to ensure significant reductions to their utility bills.
We really need an alternative to allow anyone, regardless of their home status, to subscribe to clean energy that needs to be built in the state, and receive true benefits on their bill, said Alexis Sutterman, energy equity program manager for the California Environmental Justice Alliance, a coalition of grassroots groups that has joined the push for community solar.
How community solar can fill gaps in the grid and help housing affordability
A key advantage of community solar-battery projects is their flexibility: Because theyre relatively small, typically about 5 megawatts, they can be built and connected to the grid in many places that utility-scale solar cant, Sutterman said. That could unlock options for dealing with a number of challenges California faces in achieving its climate and energy targets.
AB 2316 requires that low- and moderate-income households make up at least 51 percent of a community solar projects subscribers. The coalition behind the NVBT has pledged to structure payments to these households to ensure significant reductions to their utility bills.
We really need an alternative to allow anyone, regardless of their home status, to subscribe to clean energy that needs to be built in the state, and receive true benefits on their bill, said Alexis Sutterman, energy equity program manager for the California Environmental Justice Alliance, a coalition of grassroots groups that has joined the push for community solar.
How community solar can fill gaps in the grid and help housing affordability
A key advantage of community solar-battery projects is their flexibility: Because theyre relatively small, typically about 5 megawatts, they can be built and connected to the grid in many places that utility-scale solar cant, Sutterman said. That could unlock options for dealing with a number of challenges California faces in achieving its climate and energy targets.
Cross-posted to Environment and Energy
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 2175 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The fight over California community solar: 'It's everyone vs. utilities' (Original Post)
usonian
Sep 2023
OP
The Mouth
(3,285 posts)1. The change in Net Energy Metering
was devastating to the solar business.
Good intentions, utterly idiotic.
usonian
(13,848 posts)2. I guess that it benefits the battery maker
and that would be?
Never mind.
The Mouth
(3,285 posts)3. It was supposedly because current solar rules favored 'rich' people
But what actually happened is that no one now but the VERY rich can afford solar. They drastically reversed the economic feasibility of rooftop solar.
usonian
(13,848 posts)4. You're preaching to the choir.
The very rich can and do go off-grid entirely.
The PUC is in the back pocket of the utilities. Get slobs to pay for the batteries.
Frickin welfare for the rich, everywhere. The lies are their disguise.