California
Related: About this forumHistoric California dam removal, meant to help salmon, sees massive die-off
San Francisco Chronicle . March 3, 2024
Hundreds of thousands of young salmon are believed to have died this week at the site of a historic dam removal project on the Klamath River, after an effort to restore salmon runs on the newly unconstrained river went awry, the Chronicle has learned.
The dead chinook salmon were among the first hatchery fish released on the Klamath since four hydroelectric dams were breached near the California-Oregon border, to allow the river to flow freely again and ultimately help fish flourish. One of the dams has been fully removed, and the three others are scheduled to come out later this year.
The salmon die-off, discovered downstream of the 173-foot Iron Gate Dam, is thought to be the result of trauma the small fish experienced when they went through a tunnel at the dams base, which had been opened to allow the river to pass and dam demolition to proceed. Water pressure in the outlet tunnel was presumably too great, causing the fish to die of what appears to be gas bubble disease, California officials told the Chronicle.
No one, especially those in my program who work night and day to keep fish alive, wants to see something like this happen, said Jason Roberts, an environmental program manager for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Were going to learn from it. We need to do better.
Link (paywall): https://www.sfchronicle.com/california/article/klamath-dams-salmon-die-off-18700078.php
According to the link, about 830,000 hatchery-raised chinook were released. Each was roughly 1 to 2 inches long, the majority of which died or probably soon will.
Excellent intention, nightmare result.
Think. Again.
(17,324 posts)Auggie
(31,772 posts)But it sounds to me like one massive fuck-up -- not accounting for what might have killed the hatchlings: gas bubble disease, caused by high water pressure.
Think. Again.
(17,324 posts)....be sure to account for the safety and protection of wildlife when making any changes to those structures after they're built.
but we're only human. Mistakes are made. Learn from them, adjust and move forward.
The overall goal is to get the species back to historic levels. Removing dams and allowing for unrestricted movement should help in the long run.
Too many times folks pile on when things go wrong. Change is messy; that's why it's so hard sometimes.
jimfields33
(18,538 posts)This was big time derelict doing the job.
Auggie
(31,772 posts)Wonder Why
(4,572 posts)They put in a dam. They mess up Mother Nature.
They take it out but don't do it right. They mess up Mother Nature.
If they put women in charge, would they do better? They can't do worse!
IcyPeas
(22,557 posts)From the link:
Project managers have dismissed the allegations as mischaracterizations of whats happening. Theyve repeatedly said that what has been observed, excluding this weeks salmon die-off, was exactly what was expected.
Planning documents projected that 5 million to 7 million cubic yards of sediment would be unleashed from the reservoirs, turbidity would increase and dissolved oxygen levels would drop in the river for several months and nonnative fish unaccustomed to cold river flows would die.