Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Zorro

(16,330 posts)
Thu Sep 5, 2024, 08:56 AM Sep 5

Why did authorities kill Malibu puma who attacked a boy? 'We don't have mountain lion jail'

After a mountain lion attacked a 5-year-old boy over the weekend, some commenters on social media blasted officials’ decision to kill the big cat and accused the boy’s family of provoking the animal.

It was hard for some to understand why there wasn’t another way to deal with the issue, given all the efforts to help the dwindling mountain lion population in Southern California and the love L.A. had for its favorite cat, P-22.

“That’s what happens when we are in their territory!” wrote one woman on Facebook.

“Couldn’t relocate the lion had to kill it!! But that’s we what we do we destroy everything like a plague to make more room for more in the way people,” wrote another.

But experts said that the killing of the puma was likely the only responsible answer after the cat pounced on the young boy, who was in a designated picnic area with dozens of other people.

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-09-04/officials-had-to-kill-mountain-lion-that-attacked-child-expert-says

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why did authorities kill Malibu puma who attacked a boy? 'We don't have mountain lion jail' (Original Post) Zorro Sep 5 OP
They seem to do that with most animals who attack humans. jimfields33 Sep 5 #1
Because once they taste human blood, they may find it an easier meal than searching for traditional prey. Wonder Why Sep 5 #5
Good point. jimfields33 Sep 5 #6
Assholes Auggie Sep 5 #2
probably not. this was much more likely stopdiggin Sep 5 #4
clearly aberrant and dangerous behavior stopdiggin Sep 5 #3

stopdiggin

(12,881 posts)
4. probably not. this was much more likely
Thu Sep 5, 2024, 09:14 AM
Sep 5

a decision made with some real consideration and regret in play. Just not a whole lot of real (viable) options.

stopdiggin

(12,881 posts)
3. clearly aberrant and dangerous behavior
Thu Sep 5, 2024, 09:11 AM
Sep 5

there are animals that are not going to make good neighbors (and should not be attempted)
re-homing these animals - does not have the successful conclusion that many readily assume. oftentimes it is a deadly option for the animal, with a lingering and miserable end. and so, regrettably ...

and, sadly - no, we are not going to move the population of LA elsewhere.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»Why did authorities kill ...