Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(70,748 posts)
Fri Sep 27, 2024, 05:04 PM Sep 27

California ballot measure appears to target a single nonprofit -- and it's furious

If you check California’s official voter guide – or even the text of the proposed law – for information on Prop 34, they’ll tell you the measure requires “certain providers” to spend virtually all of the money they receive from a federal prescription drug program on patient services.

But the measure’s backers have repeatedly pointed to one group that would likely be subject to the requirements. And that group says it’s being illegally targeted.

Whether Prop 34 really singles out one specific nonprofit, or could also apply to a handful of other groups, is a matter of fierce debate between supporters and opponents, but one thing seems clear: The question will go to the courts if Prop 34 passes.

Opponents say Prop 34 is aimed at undercutting the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, a Los Angeles-based, politically active organization serving HIV and AIDS patients.The group is the primary sponsor of the Yes on 33 campaign, which aims to remove restrictions on rent control from state law, and has spent at least $41 million supporting the measure. It also sponsored rent control ballot measures unsuccessfully twice before, in 2018 and 2020.



https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/prop-34-aids-healthcare-19789238.php

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California ballot measure appears to target a single nonprofit -- and it's furious (Original Post) RandySF Sep 27 OP
Thanks for the heads up. I haven't many of the proposition. JohnSJ Sep 27 #1
33 and 34 are the biggest misinformation props this cycle. SleeplessinSoCal Sep 27 #2
Why shouldn't a program receiving federal money for prescription drugs be required to spend it on patients? MichMan Sep 27 #3

JohnSJ

(96,657 posts)
1. Thanks for the heads up. I haven't many of the proposition.
Fri Sep 27, 2024, 05:10 PM
Sep 27

I will go to CalMatters to see how they present the pro and cons, and look at the endorsements.




SleeplessinSoCal

(9,688 posts)
2. 33 and 34 are the biggest misinformation props this cycle.
Fri Sep 27, 2024, 05:11 PM
Sep 27

As a beneficiary of rent control (via rent stabilization in NYC), I'm voting yes on 33. And apparently it follows to vote no on 34.

MichMan

(13,300 posts)
3. Why shouldn't a program receiving federal money for prescription drugs be required to spend it on patients?
Fri Sep 27, 2024, 05:25 PM
Sep 27

Especially those afflicted with HIV and AIDS.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»California ballot measure...