Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

madamesilverspurs

(16,050 posts)
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 02:51 PM Mar 2015

He asked, let's answer.

This is his facebook page. Fair warning: Take some tylenol before reading the comments posted.




Gardner does not have a reputation for corresponding with anyone who hasn't donated to his coffers. His facebook page could make his 'selectiveness' more public.

Let's keep answering, see what happens.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
He asked, let's answer. (Original Post) madamesilverspurs Mar 2015 OP
Loved this comment: CrispyQ Mar 2015 #1
I contacted him re: his signature on Iran letter. beveeheart Mar 2015 #2
I got, word for word, the exact letter.. mountain grammy Mar 2015 #3
me too.. likesmountains 52 Mar 2015 #4
Ditto Colorado Liberal Mar 2015 #5

CrispyQ

(38,287 posts)
1. Loved this comment:
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 02:58 PM
Mar 2015
Get rid of common core. Also, some posts are in first person and others are in third. Do you actually write these or....?



beveeheart

(1,405 posts)
2. I contacted him re: his signature on Iran letter.
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 04:01 PM
Mar 2015

Here's his reply:

Thank you for contacting me regarding Iran. I appreciate you taking the time to write. It is an honor to serve you in the United States Senate and I hope you will continue to write with your thoughts and ideas on moving our country forward.

Concern about Iran's nuclear weapon capabilities has been growing for over a decade. In 2002, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) first discovered that Iran was engaging in a variety of nuclear activities which violated its obligations as a signatory of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The international community has since pressured Iran to discontinue these activities through both diplomacy and sanctions. Recent negotiations have been led by the six P5+1 countries, which include the United States, China, France, Germany, Russia, and the United Kingdom, and a Joint Plan of Action (JPA) was agreed to on November 24, 2013. This JPA, which went into effect on January 20, 2014, provides Iran with sanctions relief in exchange for Iranian commitments to halt enrichment activities and neutralize existing stockpiles of enriched uranium. The deadline for a final nuclear accord has been set for June 30, 2015.

The leaders of Iran's regime, the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism, need to know that no deal with the United States will be considered permanent without the approval of the Congress which is why I joined 46 other United States Senators in signing an open letter to the leaders of Iran regarding negotiations with the United States about their nuclear program. The letter clarifies for Iranian leaders our constitutional system of government, and makes clear that any deal between President Obama and Ayatollah Khamenei that is not approved by the U.S. Congress could easily be modified or revoked in the future. The American people, through their representatives in Congress, will reject any deal that does not completely eliminate the threat of a nuclear Iran.

I believe that Iran cannot be allowed to develop nuclear weapons and additional action may be required to stop the progression of its nuclear program. On January 27, 2015, Senator Mark Kirk (R-IL) and Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) introduced S. 269, the Nuclear Weapon Free Iran Act of 2015. I am a cosponsor of this legislation and I also support Senator Bob Corker's (R-TN) S. 625, the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015. The Kirk-Menendez legislation would re-impose sanctions on Iran should negotiating parties fail to reach a comprehensive nuclear agreement prior to the June 30, 2015 deadline and mandate new sanctions should Iran continue to deceive the international community. Senator Corker's bill would require the administration to submit any potential agreement with Iran to the U.S. Congress. On January 29, 2015, the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs advanced the Kirk-Menendez legislation by a vote of 18-4.

There is no doubt that a nuclear-armed Iran would destabilize an already volatile region and directly threaten our close allies, such as Israel, as well as U.S. national security. Ever since its statehood, Israel has been a shining light for democracy in a politically unstable region. Iran's regime, however, refuses to recognize Israel's right to exist and has repeatedly said that it plans to "wipe Israel off the map." A nuclear-armed Iran is an existential threat to Israel. It is imperative that we do everything we can to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon and from becoming nuclear-capable. We must also continue to provide all the support we can toward Israel. Standing by Israel is one of my top priorities in Congress.

Rest assured, I am closely monitoring the situation in Iran and will keep your concerns in mind should Congressional action be taken on this issue. Again, thank you for contacting me, and do not hesitate to do so again when an issue is important to you.


My next email to him will be about his stand against the SNAP program.

Colorado Liberal

(152 posts)
5. Ditto
Tue Mar 17, 2015, 04:15 PM
Mar 2015

And of course, that long cut-and-paste response didn't address any of the questions I actually asked in my letter...

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Colorado»He asked, let's answer.