Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(116,301 posts)
Mon Nov 19, 2018, 09:09 AM Nov 2018

Boulder, Weld differ greatly with intents for respective mineral ownerships

Both Boulder and Weld counties own a substantial amount of mineral rights, but how they are viewed and used by the respective local governments couldn’t be more different.

Boulder County sees its mineral rights — and the initiative to acquire more with new land purchases — as protective measures against new oil and gas drilling projects by private companies, despite receiving more than $1.7 million over the past five years in royalties from drilling operators harvesting the county’s hydrocarbons.

That revenue, which doesn’t include taxes on oil and gas production and sales, is used by Boulder County’s Parks and Open Space Department to manage its agricultural properties. It isn’t the money, however, the county is after when looking to add to its mineral ownership.

But the strategy of gaining mineral rights with land can be ineffective at safeguarding against new drilling.

Read more: https://www.denverpost.com/2018/11/17/boulder-weld-mineral-rights-oil-gas/

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Colorado»Boulder, Weld differ grea...