Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(116,744 posts)
Wed Jun 12, 2019, 05:11 PM Jun 2019

Blumenthal, Murphy try again to strip legal shield from gun industry

Washington – After Lonnie and Sandy Phillips lost their 24-year-old daughter, Jessi, in a 2012 mass shooting in a movie theater in Aurora, Co., the couple tried to sue the online retailer who sold their daughter’s killer 4,000 rounds of armor-piercing ammunition without a background check.

But because a federal law gives gun retailers and gun manufacturers unique legal protections, the Phillips’ lawsuit was dismissed. The couple not only had to pay their own legal fees, but a judge ordered them to pay the retailer, Lucky Gunner, $200,000 to cover its legal expenses.

Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy have been trying for years to level that legal playing field to help people like the Phillips and other victims of gun violence seeking to sue the gun industry, including a group of Sandy Hook families.

On Tuesday, the senators introduced a bill for the fourth time that would repeal the gun industry’s legal protections.

Read more: https://ctmirror.org/2019/06/11/blumenthal-murphy-try-again-to-strip-legal-shield-from-gun-industry/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Blumenthal, Murphy try again to strip legal shield from gun industry (Original Post) TexasTowelie Jun 2019 OP
There is no federal requirement for background checks on ammo hack89 Jun 2019 #1
Would really like to see this pass someday. Ads like Bushmaster's Hoyt Jun 2019 #2

hack89

(39,179 posts)
1. There is no federal requirement for background checks on ammo
Wed Jun 12, 2019, 05:20 PM
Jun 2019

So how can they be negligent?

And armor piercing ammo was not used at Aurora. It is illegal per federal law.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
2. Would really like to see this pass someday. Ads like Bushmaster's
Wed Jun 12, 2019, 05:22 PM
Jun 2019

Get Your “Man Card” renewed by buying an AR-15, lobbying efforts against gun control, our bullets kill better, etc., definitely have an impact on killings, putting more weapons on street, etc.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Connecticut»Blumenthal, Murphy try ag...