Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(116,744 posts)
Sat Sep 15, 2018, 08:27 AM Sep 2018

On The Issue of Pre-Existing Coverage There's Common Ground

NEW HAVEN, CT — Connecticut has passed a number of laws recently that mandate health insurance sold in the Nutmeg state must actually provide coverage for consumers.

Earlier this year, the General Assembly approved and Democratic Gov. Dannel P. Malloy signed legislation that says insurance companies must cover pre-existing conditions if the Affordable Care Act is overturned by the courts or Congress eliminates it. The bill passed with overwhelming bipartisan support. It passed the House 114-32 and the Senate 34-2. Sens. John Kissel and Joe Markley were the only votes against it.

Markley is Stefanowski’s running mate. However, a spokesman for Stefanowski’s campaign said no one should read anything into that.

Stefanowski “opposes any efforts to remove coverage for pre-existing conditions,” Kendall Marr, Stefanowski’s spokesman, said.

Read more: https://www.ctnewsjunkie.com/archives/entry/20180914_on_the_issue_of_pre-existing_coverage_theres_common_ground/

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On The Issue of Pre-Existing Coverage There's Common Ground (Original Post) TexasTowelie Sep 2018 OP
Makes common sense, doesn't it? They require all drivers get insurance and the like, so ... SWBTATTReg Sep 2018 #1

SWBTATTReg

(24,085 posts)
1. Makes common sense, doesn't it? They require all drivers get insurance and the like, so ...
Sat Sep 15, 2018, 08:55 AM
Sep 2018

all will be covered, why not health insurance? I never could understand why people resist this...for if we didn't have 100% health insurance for all, then hospitals / doctors / etc. will have to write off a whole lot more uncollectible bills (people unable to pay these medical bills), which are dispersed among all of us anyways.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Connecticut»On The Issue of Pre-Exist...