One year we had 14 or more and they really wanted 20 but some ended up not being on the ballot. 14 or more to too many. Most are approved.

I don’t trust the current republican majority legislature to do that, what would happen is they would keep off petitions that they don’t agree with, effectively vetoing the petition. My position is that if a petition meets the voter signature threshold and is not redundant of very similar to another petition that is up, it should appear on the ballot, regardless of the number. I am ok with similar petitions being combined and re-worded before being put before General voters, as long as the combination and wording retains the intent of the two petitioners.

Do you think it may have turned off some voters who had to stand in line much longer then normal because instead of 10 minutes to vote it took 15 minutes or more.

If they don’t vote, that part of their ballot get counted as not voted.

of looking up a Judge’s record and voting to retain that Judge or not retain that Judge.

There is a limit on citizen sourced provisions that says you can only do one thing in a citizen sourced (I'm paraphrasing here) amendment. So this would have to be done in multiple phases. I get the idea, and I'm behind the idea of restoring voter's rights. It may not matter in FL, however.

Could that billionaire from NYC pay the fees so that all these people could vote? That would solve the problem until the courts can step in. Certainly a quicker solution.