Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(70,613 posts)
Tue Oct 22, 2024, 02:19 PM Oct 22

Pros and cons on Florida's Amendment 2: Preserving the right to hunt and fish

Among the less publicized constitutional amendments Florida voters will decide next month is a measure that would enshrine the right to hunt and fish in the state’s Constitution with Amendment 2.

The ballot language says this:

“Proposing an amendment to the State Constitution to preserve forever fishing and hunting, including by the use of traditional methods, as a public right and preferred means of responsibly managing and controlling fish and wildlife. Specifies that the amendment does not limit the authority granted to the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission under Section 9 of Article IV of the State Constitution.”

“Yes, that’s the language that’s in the statute, but a future legislator could come in in a few years and say, ‘We don’t like this anymore,” said Martha Guyas, Southeast fisheries policy director for the American Sportfishing Association based in Tallahassee, which supports the initiative.




https://floridaphoenix.com/2024/10/22/pros-and-cons-on-floridas-amendment-2-preserving-the-right-to-hunt-and-fish/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pros and cons on Florida's Amendment 2: Preserving the right to hunt and fish (Original Post) RandySF Oct 22 OP
I was told that Florida Democrats' official stand on this is NO radical noodle Oct 22 #1
I'd vote no Jerry2144 Oct 22 #2
I voted NO. It wants to encroach on the Fish and Wildlife Conservation responsibilities too much for me Deuxcents Oct 22 #3

Jerry2144

(2,618 posts)
2. I'd vote no
Tue Oct 22, 2024, 02:25 PM
Oct 22

If there is a reason to stop allowing hunting of a certain animal, that amendment would block the logical reason. For instance, a species is endangered or on the verge of extinction, the state or fed can’t block a hunter’s “right” to kill it

Deuxcents

(19,694 posts)
3. I voted NO. It wants to encroach on the Fish and Wildlife Conservation responsibilities too much for me
Tue Oct 22, 2024, 02:52 PM
Oct 22
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Florida»Pros and cons on Florida'...