Florida Supreme Court justices Renatha Francis (left) and Meredith Sasso need Floridians’ votes to keep their seats on the state’s highest court. They are the only two justices who tried to block both the abortion and marijuana amendments from getting on the ballot – an opinion that even their conservative peers on the court said was wrong. (Florida Supreme Court)


I receive more email from readers asking for guidance on judicial elections than anything else. Quite understandably.

Most everyone knows whether they prefer Kamala Harris or Donald Trump. But how on earth are you supposed to know whether Paetra T. Brownlee deserves to keep her seat on the Fifth District Court of Appeal?

It’s hard to cast an informed vote — especially since this state’s legal community has largely abdicated its responsibility to help voters do so. (More on that in a moment.)

But there are a few judges who’ve made ugly headlines that can help make your decisions easier.

For instance, there are two Supreme Court justices asking to keep their seats: Renatha Francis and Meredith Sasso. I’m saying no to both.

Both faced questions about their qualifications. (The governor’s own Supreme Court appointees refused to seat Francis the first time Ron DeSantis nominated her because she hadn’t even been a lawyer long enough. And Sasso was first nominated to an appeals court by a nominating commission whose members included her own father-in-law.)

But the main reason neither justice deserves to remain on the state’s highest court is because they tried to improperly thwart your right to vote this year. Not just according to me. According to their peers on the court.