Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

murielm99

(31,438 posts)
Fri Jun 12, 2015, 04:06 PM Jun 2015

Judge Who Donated to Hastert's Campaign

Can Stay on Case.

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/judge-who-gave-dennis-hasterts-campaign-can-stay-case-n373886

snip--

Former House Speaker Dennis Hastert's federal hush money case will go forward with a judge who donated to his campaign fund years ago.

Prosecutors and defense attorneys were given a chance to ask that U.S. District Judge Thomas Durkin be disqualified because of the contributions, but in papers filed in Chicago Federal Court on Thursday, both sides said they are fine with him staying.

snip--

This judge is the brother of Jim Durkin, who is the Republican minority leader in the Illinois house. Jim Durkin ran against Durbin for Senate in 2002. Jim Durkin was Romney's campaign manager here as well.

I know Springfield is small and everyone knows each other. But this is a Federal case. I am not sure how I feel about this.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge Who Donated to Hastert's Campaign (Original Post) murielm99 Jun 2015 OP
That should result in an automatic recuse... Cooley Hurd Jun 2015 #1
Denny is still well connected, hence protected I imagine. peacebird Jun 2015 #2
One of the liberal commentators on MSNBC COLGATE4 Jun 2015 #3
That is why I was not sure how I felt. murielm99 Jun 2015 #4
In fact, he offered, and gave both side the choice. ChairmanAgnostic Jun 2015 #5
The judge might be angry and bitter. mucifer Jun 2015 #6
I am hearing only positive things about the judge. murielm99 Jun 2015 #7

COLGATE4

(14,840 posts)
3. One of the liberal commentators on MSNBC
Fri Jun 12, 2015, 04:58 PM
Jun 2015

(Rachel, I think) made clear that both Prosecutors AND Defense Attorneys in the Hastert case will be very unlikely to challenge Durkin, who has a stellar reputation as a squeaky-clean, by the book trial judge. The fact that he contributed $2000 to Hastert's campaign way back when isn't an automatic disqualifier. There won't be any motion for him to recuse himself.

murielm99

(31,438 posts)
4. That is why I was not sure how I felt.
Fri Jun 12, 2015, 05:32 PM
Jun 2015

I know how it works here. There are some very squeaky-clean and very capable people in Illinois who have family and party connections with others who are not so clean. That is just how it is in Illinois. Families, on both sides of the aisle, run everything.

There is another judge who is a Fawell. She had to preside over a corruption case here. She was actually the best person to do it, even though some members of her family are notorious. Scott Fawell, Ryan's chief of staff, was in jail until he ratted out Ryan. I grew up in West Chicago, the Fawell family's stomping ground. I know Scott. He was in my brother's graduating class. My dad used to argue with Scott's mother all the time. He would accuse her to her face of being a corrupt politician. Most of the Fawells are crooks. But this is Illinois.

Look at the Madigans. Most of the Democrats I know gripe about Mike Madigan all the time. But we need him where he is. I would hate to see the power vacuum he would leave filled by an Illinois repubbie. And Lisa, his daughter, is one of the best attorneys general in the country.

We have an interesting and complicated state.

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
5. In fact, he offered, and gave both side the choice.
Fri Jun 12, 2015, 10:14 PM
Jun 2015

He acted quite properly here. Both sides recognize that he is a fine addition to the bench, and that both sides could do far worse.

murielm99

(31,438 posts)
7. I am hearing only positive things about the judge.
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 01:53 PM
Jun 2015

Now they are asking that some of the evidence be kept confidential:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/06/12/us-usa-crime-hastert-idUSKBN0OS2DU20150612

Let's see how things work out. This could be a slow process. The material is sensitive to others, not just Hastert. Let's see how it works out. But even my fellow Democrats in Illinois think this judge is a fair person.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Illinois»Judge Who Donated to Hast...