Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(116,813 posts)
Mon Aug 22, 2016, 03:36 AM Aug 2016

Gay rights setback seen in Illinois Supreme Court ruling

CHICAGO (AP) — An Illinois Supreme Court ruling is a step backward for same-sex couples and will harm all unmarried domestic partners who might want a court to decide a property dispute after a break-up, according to gay rights advocates.

The court on Thursday rejected 5-2 a claim by a Chicago woman who split up with her partner after nearly 30 years of living together and raising children. The two women split in 2008, years before Illinois legalized same-sex marriage.

Eileen Brewer, a Cook County judge, was seeking a share in Dr. Jane Blumenthal's medical practice as restitution. Her attorneys asked the state high court to overturn its 1979 position barring such claims by unmarried partners.

The case was seen by some legal observers as a chance for the justices to update their position in the context of expanding protections for same-sex couples and all unmarried couples and their children.

Read more: http://www.qconline.com/news/illinois/gay-rights-setback-seen-in-illinois-supreme-court-ruling/article_2c7720ee-664a-11e6-9b50-074990b2a48b.html

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gay rights setback seen in Illinois Supreme Court ruling (Original Post) TexasTowelie Aug 2016 OP
Not an accurate description. ChairmanAgnostic Aug 2016 #1

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
1. Not an accurate description.
Mon Aug 22, 2016, 05:59 AM
Aug 2016

I read the decision. It was well reasoned given the historical facts and the law that existed At that time.

To have ruled otherwise would have destroyed the whole idea of interpreting statutory law, destroying precedent, and turning our legal system into a potluck dinner. The chaos would have been severe and destructive.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Illinois»Gay rights setback seen i...