Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Did Reynolds Administration violate Iowa's constitution at the Iowa State Fair?
Bob Krause, Iowa View contributor Published 2:21 p.m. CT Aug. 23, 2018
Courage was on display in the Democratic veterans’ response when the Iowa Commission of Veterans Affairs (ICVA) vetoed the Iowa Democratic Veterans Caucus parade entry at the Iowa State Fair Veterans Parade. Rightfully, they protested. But was it about freedom?
I maintain that “yes.” It was about freedom. The ICVA is part of the Reynolds Administration, and is subject to the Constitution of Iowa, Article 1, Section 7:
“Liberty of speech and press. Section 7. Every person may speak, write, and publish his sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right. No law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech, or of the press ...”
So, is the claimed legal authority the ICVA just plain wrong? Yes. Any state legal device, rule or law claimed to abridge the free speech of the Democratic veterans at the Iowa State Fair parade falls before the Constitution. And the rule prohibiting partisan or political displays in the parade is unconstitutional.
...
As a veteran, that is the worst example for veterans that one can make – that it is somehow wrong for a veteran to participate in our two-party democratic system. This is what the ban on marching was about – the stifling of dissent. Why would one not want diversity of thought and opinion, unless it was a thought and opinion with which you disagreed?
So we were singled out among the many activist groups and candidates at the fair. And why? Perhaps the Iowa Democratic Veterans Caucus was just too visible in a potentially bad year for the GOP. Kim Reynolds’ weak poll numbers have Republicans worried. Worried politicians tend to over-react – not unlike President Trump has done on the national level.
So think about it. The veterans of the Iowa Democratic Veterans Caucus have marched in this parade with no challenges over a 10-year span. But suddenly they are political? It is too bad the Reynolds Administration has been swept up in Trump’s swing to authoritarianism. The lines of political decorum have shifted. Things that no one would have considered ethical or fair years ago are now cropping up on a state as well as a national setting.
...
https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/columnists/iowa-view/2018/08/23/did-reynolds-administration-violate-iowas-constitution-iowa-state-fair/1068142002/
Courage was on display in the Democratic veterans’ response when the Iowa Commission of Veterans Affairs (ICVA) vetoed the Iowa Democratic Veterans Caucus parade entry at the Iowa State Fair Veterans Parade. Rightfully, they protested. But was it about freedom?
I maintain that “yes.” It was about freedom. The ICVA is part of the Reynolds Administration, and is subject to the Constitution of Iowa, Article 1, Section 7:
“Liberty of speech and press. Section 7. Every person may speak, write, and publish his sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right. No law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech, or of the press ...”
So, is the claimed legal authority the ICVA just plain wrong? Yes. Any state legal device, rule or law claimed to abridge the free speech of the Democratic veterans at the Iowa State Fair parade falls before the Constitution. And the rule prohibiting partisan or political displays in the parade is unconstitutional.
...
As a veteran, that is the worst example for veterans that one can make – that it is somehow wrong for a veteran to participate in our two-party democratic system. This is what the ban on marching was about – the stifling of dissent. Why would one not want diversity of thought and opinion, unless it was a thought and opinion with which you disagreed?
So we were singled out among the many activist groups and candidates at the fair. And why? Perhaps the Iowa Democratic Veterans Caucus was just too visible in a potentially bad year for the GOP. Kim Reynolds’ weak poll numbers have Republicans worried. Worried politicians tend to over-react – not unlike President Trump has done on the national level.
So think about it. The veterans of the Iowa Democratic Veterans Caucus have marched in this parade with no challenges over a 10-year span. But suddenly they are political? It is too bad the Reynolds Administration has been swept up in Trump’s swing to authoritarianism. The lines of political decorum have shifted. Things that no one would have considered ethical or fair years ago are now cropping up on a state as well as a national setting.
...
https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/columnists/iowa-view/2018/08/23/did-reynolds-administration-violate-iowas-constitution-iowa-state-fair/1068142002/
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
