Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Iowa
Related: About this forumI Was the Subject of a Political 'Witch Hunt.' Matt Whitaker Directed It.
Matt McCoy is a state senator from Iowa's 21st District.
On the morning of April 7, 2006, two FBI agents knocked on my door. They informed me that I was being investigated about issues related to bribery and violation of the Hobbs Act. As I tried to recall what the Hobbs Act entailed (robbery and extortion, mostly), they prolonged their visit by pressing play on a tape recorder. I was shocked to hear a conversation I had conducted with my business colleague, Tom Vasquez.
...
At the time, David Yepsen of the Register wrote: It appears the U.S. attorney, Matt Whitaker, is aggressively going after the citys south-side Democratic organization and the way it does business. You could call it due diligence, and, to be clear, the investigation and secret recording of my conversations was done in a fully legal manner. But if you consider Whitakers naked partisanship, as Yepsen did, and the fact that a study at the time showed that the Ashcroft and Gonzales Departments of Justice prosecuted Democrats to an extent grossly disproportionate to Republicans, you could refer to it as something very different. In Whitakers own recent words: a witch hunt.
...
Whitaker has attempted to establish his own career in Iowa politics. He lost a run for state treasurer in 2002, lost a Republican primary bid for the U.S. Senate in 2014, and was not selected for a seat on the Iowa Supreme Court despite angling for the job. Its hard to believe he could carry out the important job of United States attorney general with a sense of fealty to the law and to the Constitution, rather than to the Republican Party.
The governments invasion of my privacy during the case Whitakers office brought against me was hardly unusual for such an investigation, but considering my innocence and exculpation it was appalling: I was followed, my conversations were recorded, and my financial records were seized. Family members, co-workers, legislative colleagues and acquaintances were questioned. My emails were read. The emails and financial records of a business colleague were subpoenaed. My reputation and future were damaged. The emotional stress took its toll on my physical and mental health. I lost both actual and potential income, along with my savings. When the DOJ wields its power in a partisan manner, it ruins lives. Whitaker almost ruined mine.
I left in debt, and with and a shattered sense of security. Whitaker left noting his complete confidence in the jury system.
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/11/11/matthew-whitaker-iowa-witch-hunt-222408?fbclid=IwAR1w7mxCqLq7Fxr5a9L3b2gCU6RZqlUTsWRyqtfDeF1cC10Y-bnckbEG3AE
On the morning of April 7, 2006, two FBI agents knocked on my door. They informed me that I was being investigated about issues related to bribery and violation of the Hobbs Act. As I tried to recall what the Hobbs Act entailed (robbery and extortion, mostly), they prolonged their visit by pressing play on a tape recorder. I was shocked to hear a conversation I had conducted with my business colleague, Tom Vasquez.
...
At the time, David Yepsen of the Register wrote: It appears the U.S. attorney, Matt Whitaker, is aggressively going after the citys south-side Democratic organization and the way it does business. You could call it due diligence, and, to be clear, the investigation and secret recording of my conversations was done in a fully legal manner. But if you consider Whitakers naked partisanship, as Yepsen did, and the fact that a study at the time showed that the Ashcroft and Gonzales Departments of Justice prosecuted Democrats to an extent grossly disproportionate to Republicans, you could refer to it as something very different. In Whitakers own recent words: a witch hunt.
...
Whitaker has attempted to establish his own career in Iowa politics. He lost a run for state treasurer in 2002, lost a Republican primary bid for the U.S. Senate in 2014, and was not selected for a seat on the Iowa Supreme Court despite angling for the job. Its hard to believe he could carry out the important job of United States attorney general with a sense of fealty to the law and to the Constitution, rather than to the Republican Party.
The governments invasion of my privacy during the case Whitakers office brought against me was hardly unusual for such an investigation, but considering my innocence and exculpation it was appalling: I was followed, my conversations were recorded, and my financial records were seized. Family members, co-workers, legislative colleagues and acquaintances were questioned. My emails were read. The emails and financial records of a business colleague were subpoenaed. My reputation and future were damaged. The emotional stress took its toll on my physical and mental health. I lost both actual and potential income, along with my savings. When the DOJ wields its power in a partisan manner, it ruins lives. Whitaker almost ruined mine.
I left in debt, and with and a shattered sense of security. Whitaker left noting his complete confidence in the jury system.
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/11/11/matthew-whitaker-iowa-witch-hunt-222408?fbclid=IwAR1w7mxCqLq7Fxr5a9L3b2gCU6RZqlUTsWRyqtfDeF1cC10Y-bnckbEG3AE
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1214 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I Was the Subject of a Political 'Witch Hunt.' Matt Whitaker Directed It. (Original Post)
progressoid
Nov 2018
OP
Pretty naked attempt at promoting a personal political career by misuse of the judicial system.
marble falls
Nov 2018
#2
yonder
(10,004 posts)1. Holy shit! I would like to see this get some legs.
marble falls
(62,240 posts)2. Pretty naked attempt at promoting a personal political career by misuse of the judicial system.
rurallib
(63,207 posts)3. If you haven't already please post in GD for a wider audience
One of the underlying motivations for Whitaker was McCoy's sexual orientation, or so I have been told. McCoy is openly gay and the xtian fascists couldn't stand the thought of a successful gay man in politics. So Whitaker Marshalls the forces of the US Justice Department to take him down.
progressoid
(50,753 posts)4. Done.