Iowa
Related: About this forumGood gawd again Reynolds! TestUtah results seem very shaky
The use of these tests is what Kim is betting you life on and opening up Iowa on. They have yet to be validated in Iowa, a process that is going on now according to Reynolds:
Now comes a story from Utah that their rate of positives is quite low.
https://www.sltrib.com/news/2020/04/30/this-is-potential-public/
The accuracy of coronavirus tests by TestUtah.com has come into question, with state data showing that the rate of positive results among people tested at its sites is less than half what it is for patients tested elsewhere in the state.
And medical experts have been raising concerns about the effort, which has funneled millions of taxpayer dollars to the Utah tech companies running it here and in two other states. While Utahs larger health care systems have relied on national names in diagnostics for their coronavirus tests, TestUtah has obtained its tests from a smaller Salt Lake City company and is processing them at a regional hospital in Orem.
I worry about having tests routed to a small community hospital lab inexperienced with highly complex molecular testing that uses a test from an unknown company without much in vitro diagnostic experience, Bert Lopansri, a specialist in infectious diseases and microbiology at Intermountain Healthcare, wrote in an April 14 email that The Salt Lake Tribune obtained through an open records request after it circulated through state offices.
A pandemic is not the time for amateurs to learn, Lopansri concluded.
much more at link
econron
(152 posts)Heard that Trump sent Trumpette some of his sharpies so she can draw on her eyebrows.
It's so distracting....
The Restaurant roll out is going to be a train wreck... from the guidance I reviewed... a lot of gray area
bubbazero
(296 posts)Keep it up Kimmy, you'll get your national exposure yet! (Course it'll be for best "snatching disaster from the jaws of common sense control" Great Fucking Job--