Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

luckyleftyme2

(3,880 posts)
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 08:36 AM Oct 2016

what defines sucking the teat?


If you spend 20 years working for some form of gov? If your company or business you work for or own depends on gov, contracts to survive. Or you or your company gets gov. grants or loans? How about if your in politics and hoping to be elected long enough to get a pension.
Well my guess is many of us at one time or another have been sucking that teat. And as we age we realize that those who dam others for political reasons are hypocrites cause they are beating that very bush to get elected.
IF MORE OF US REALIZED THAT MORE MONEY IS SPENT ON CORPORATE WELFARE THAN HUMAN WELFARE WE COULD BALANCE THE BUDGET.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
what defines sucking the teat? (Original Post) luckyleftyme2 Oct 2016 OP
The words might offend some, but describe exactly what is happening. tonyt53 Oct 2016 #1
No. Balancing the budget is a rightwing cudgel. procon Oct 2016 #2
 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
1. The words might offend some, but describe exactly what is happening.
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 08:48 AM
Oct 2016

I travel for business some and in the past few months, i keep seeing on TV/hearing on the radio politicians of all parties talking about "reducing" regulations. WTF!!! The lack of regulation and oversight almost took this country, and much of the world into another great depression. The reducing of regulations is another way of saying "more corporate welfare at the expense of human welfare".

procon

(15,805 posts)
2. No. Balancing the budget is a rightwing cudgel.
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 09:40 AM
Oct 2016

As a policy its still a cudgel because it opens the door to political extortion by the minority party. Think nearly constant government shutdowns that would require a super-majority just to raise the debt ceiling or to run a deficit during a crisis.

Imagine trying to run your household on a budget you made 20 years ago. As practiced in most states, mine included these BBAs mean that there is no new money for new infrastructure projects, upgrades, replacements, modernization, repairs, etc. We have a system of robbing Peter to pay Paul so money is 'stolen' from one government agency and shifted to another because no politician wants to be blamed by the ignorant voters for increasing taxes and spending.

Trying to portray the financial aspects of the whole country to someone's picayune family checkbook is profoundly ignorant. When we are short of money, maybe we can use credit cards or get a loan, but the payback is a huge hit. When the country needs to increase cashflow, it can issue bonds with very low interest rates to raise money, raise taxes, and even even print money in some cases.

Republicans only want to have a Balanced Budgets to prevent Democrats from legislating progressive policies.
Please do a bit more studying before buying into the GOPs tactic.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Maine»what defines sucking the ...