It may say at the bottom, but I can't read it.

Those of us who sold our time for wages sure have made out like bandits. Great system we got here. And honestly it did more or less work for our parents, but the great clawback of neoliberal reform from the late 70s onward has restored the balance to where it was circa 1890 or so.

No idea where the author of this graph got his data from, but it sure doesn't seem to correlate to reality.

It says it's the cost to live between age 61 and 76 in the average city in that state. Whatever that means.

So if they are saying $750k, it's budgeting about $50k a year without taking inflation into consideration.

I don't think you could live in a major city on $50k when rent alone is about $2k a month. But I suppose if you were healthy and lived in a group setting, you could do it. It would be easier in an area with lower rent and public transit though.

That $770K number has to relate to York and Cumberland counties, only. The other 90% - (land-wise) has many towns that are dying......if you only have SS and enjoy the quiet / outdoors life, this is the place for you.

Not even close.

So much for freedom from taxation. I guess they get you other ways.

but you can't fix stupid. Sales tax, property tax, P&C insurance (car, home), medical insurance will get you every time.

While this is interesting, without more information, it's fairly vacuous. The methodology is vague, the source is unverifiable, (I search NetCredit's website but couldn't find this chart), and the financial projection is suspect as it doesn't include detailed financial data.

Still, it's interesting in a broader sense. Thanks for posting it.

It's fascinating to see the comparisons state-by-state.

Happy new year.

Probably more detail. There is world retirement map....I can't qualify in 95% of the reported locations.

in bottom left says.

So, ‘state by state’ isn’t entirely accurate.

Either way, too many GOP’sters will be crying for a gub’mnt hand out years after they voted for tax cuts for billionaires.