what the other guy posts

I copied a response to a post in another forum because I thought the resonse showed that the orginal poster was bias!
"Because if it is free, you don't have to pay for it. Lets not pretend the King Campaign is the first to get free legal help. Maybe you would like to check and see what Paul Lepage paid PretiFlaherty for partner Ann Robinson's free legal assistance? I believe PierceAtwood also did work for the LePage campaign/transition.

Just because you post something and attempt to put it in a bad light does not make it so. Your CMP/$8M post looks like a page torn from the Maine People's Alliance handbook of how to attack the self-sufficient. If he is guilty of taking advantage of government policies for personal gain, I am sure you will be as vociferous about Poliquin doing the same."
the part above is a response to a fruitcake's post in another forum attacking gov. King for seeking free legal advice."
you know none of us are perfect but most of us try see why the other guy is making a point that you don't agree with. And you may never agree with. that doesn't mean your right or they are.
I thought the response this guy made to the nut case was to the point and defintely accurate.
I also think that if more people would respond in the manner this person did we all would get this state back on track!
I might add that several of the fruitcakes party have responded to his attack on "king" with
a critical opinion of his post!
wanna bet someone from that forum is reading this within an hour of my posting it!
ya ek i agree he is hurting ur party!