Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(136,071 posts)
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 01:21 PM Jul 2017

from Jamie Raskin:

UPDATE: We just won a big victory in the Defense Authorization bill, defeating 217-208 the anti-Muslim amendment I railed against in this speech. Original post: The First Amendment compels government neutrality among religions. Rep. Trent Franks' (R-Az) amendment would direct the government to do a study exclusively on the Islamic religious doctrines and texts that have been used by terrorists to justify violence. But what about the religious doctrines and texts from other faiths that terrorists have used to justify violence? If we are going to study the way terrorists have exploited religion to justify violence against innocents, let's not understate the vast enormity of the problem or exacerbate it by targeting and vilifying a single religious group. The First Amendment prevents governmental scapegoating of a single religion which the Framers knew was a recipe for civil discord and state repression. Details: http://politi.co/2uf5NJ4.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Maryland»from Jamie Raskin: