Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Maryland
Related: About this forumOpinion: A Maryland judge perpetuates secrecy on clergy sex abuse
Last edited Mon Jan 23, 2023, 11:09 AM - Edit history (1)
The reports ongoing suppression remains an injustice, the Editorial Board writes.
washingtonpost.com
Opinion | A Maryland judge perpetuates secrecy on clergy sex abuse
The blocking of the release of a report on clergy sex abuse perpetuates the secrecy that gave rise to the Catholic Church's biggest scandal in centuries.
Opinion | A Maryland judge perpetuates secrecy on clergy sex abuse
The blocking of the release of a report on clergy sex abuse perpetuates the secrecy that gave rise to the Catholic Church's biggest scandal in centuries.
Link to tweet
THE POST'S VIEW
Opinion | A Maryland judge perpetuates secrecy on clergy sex abuse
By the Editorial Board
Updated January 22, 2023 at 9:34 a.m. EST|Published January 20, 2023 at 3:00 p.m. EST
Secrecy enabled clerical sexual abuse of children in the Roman Catholic Church over decades, and even now the impulse to suppress the appalling details of that abuse remains the main impediment to a full accounting of the churchs worst scandal in centuries. Its bad enough when the church continues to obstruct the release of information relating to abuse and coverup, even after Pope Francis has taken steps to lift the shroud of confidentiality that blocked disclosure for so long. It compounds the damage when courts abet that effort.
Thats what a Maryland judge has done in hiding from public view the findings of a major investigation by the state attorney generals office into eight decades of clergy sexual abuse in the Archdiocese of Baltimore. Circuit Judge Anthony Vittoria sealed not only the 456-page report, completed in November, but also any future related filings by the attorney generals office, which wants to make it public, or by an anonymous group of church-affiliated individuals named in the report that is trying to block publication. Judge Vittoria even retroactively sealed a 35-page filing by Attorney General Brian Froshs office that had already been made public and remains available online which argues persuasively for disclosure because healing is not possible without accountability and accountability is not possible without transparency.
The judges order last month is not final. On Jan. 1, he rotated to a new assignment, and another circuit court judge, Robert K. Taylor Jr., will determine whether the report can be disclosed. Nonetheless, the reports ongoing suppression remains an injustice. It denies the public access to a sweeping, detailed history of the churchs complicity in the coverup and abuse the product of a nearly four-year investigation into Baltimores sprawling archdiocese, which includes more than 150 parishes, dozens of schools, major hospitals and other facilities.
Sealing the report is also a blow to the publics right to know how more than 600 children and young adults discussed in the report and likely more who have not reported their torments allegedly fell victim to 158 priests starting in the 1940s. And it is a slap at the victims themselves. Often they have no recourse to justice in court, owing to state legislation, enacted at the churchs behest, that bars future lawsuits by adults ages 38 and older seeking restitution for the abuse they suffered as children.
{snip}
Opinion | A Maryland judge perpetuates secrecy on clergy sex abuse
By the Editorial Board
Updated January 22, 2023 at 9:34 a.m. EST|Published January 20, 2023 at 3:00 p.m. EST
CORRECTION
A earlier version of this editorial incorrectly stated that a group was seeking to seal Marylands report on clergy sexual abuse. It is seeking to seal the proceedings around the report. The version has been updated.
Secrecy enabled clerical sexual abuse of children in the Roman Catholic Church over decades, and even now the impulse to suppress the appalling details of that abuse remains the main impediment to a full accounting of the churchs worst scandal in centuries. Its bad enough when the church continues to obstruct the release of information relating to abuse and coverup, even after Pope Francis has taken steps to lift the shroud of confidentiality that blocked disclosure for so long. It compounds the damage when courts abet that effort.
Thats what a Maryland judge has done in hiding from public view the findings of a major investigation by the state attorney generals office into eight decades of clergy sexual abuse in the Archdiocese of Baltimore. Circuit Judge Anthony Vittoria sealed not only the 456-page report, completed in November, but also any future related filings by the attorney generals office, which wants to make it public, or by an anonymous group of church-affiliated individuals named in the report that is trying to block publication. Judge Vittoria even retroactively sealed a 35-page filing by Attorney General Brian Froshs office that had already been made public and remains available online which argues persuasively for disclosure because healing is not possible without accountability and accountability is not possible without transparency.
The judges order last month is not final. On Jan. 1, he rotated to a new assignment, and another circuit court judge, Robert K. Taylor Jr., will determine whether the report can be disclosed. Nonetheless, the reports ongoing suppression remains an injustice. It denies the public access to a sweeping, detailed history of the churchs complicity in the coverup and abuse the product of a nearly four-year investigation into Baltimores sprawling archdiocese, which includes more than 150 parishes, dozens of schools, major hospitals and other facilities.
Sealing the report is also a blow to the publics right to know how more than 600 children and young adults discussed in the report and likely more who have not reported their torments allegedly fell victim to 158 priests starting in the 1940s. And it is a slap at the victims themselves. Often they have no recourse to justice in court, owing to state legislation, enacted at the churchs behest, that bars future lawsuits by adults ages 38 and older seeking restitution for the abuse they suffered as children.
{snip}
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 1044 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post