Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Massachusetts
Related: About this forumJEFFREY PYLE: Why was media forced to pay DCF to do its job?
http://www.enterprisenews.com/article/20150925/NEWS/150926894/0/breaking_ajaxJEFFREY PYLE: Why was media forced to pay DCF to do its job?
By JEFFREY J. PYLE
Posted Sep. 25, 2015 at 3:13 PM
Updated Sep 25, 2015 at 3:31 PM
~snip~
Sponsors have been working to address objections of some cities and towns that new limitations on what the public can be charged for records would amount to an unfunded mandate. As that debate continues, an investigative report by the New England Center for Investigative Reporting and The Boston Globe on September 19, Out of the Shadows, highlights just how outrageous and even dangerous the public records fee charges under current law can be.
In December 2013, investigative reporter Jenifer McKim submitted a request to the Department of Children and Families for documents about child deaths linked to abuse or neglect during the years 2011, 2012 and 2013. The records shouldnt have been hard to compile. The federal Child Abuse and Prevention Treatment Act (CAPTA) requires that each state receiving federal child protection funding must disclose information about any cases of child abuse or neglect which [have] resulted in a child fatality or near fatality. Massachusetts receives about $500,000 in CAPTA funds every year.
Nonetheless, DCF told McKim that it would take many hours to compile the information, and that the agency would charge her for the time. McKim therefore narrowed her request to just one year, 2013, in the hopes of speeding up the process. Despite that narrowing DCF estimated the cost at a whopping $2,023.
McKim appealed this fee estimate to Supervisor of Records Shawn Williams at the Secretary of States Office. She noted that she was only seeking federally-required information, and argued that if DCFs files are not kept in a manner that would allow the ready retrieval of such critically important information as which children have died of neglect on DCFs watch, a requesting entity like NECIR should not be required to foot the bill.
--
If the Gov. could spend a few precious moments NOT pimping Charter Schools perhaps he could spend some time on the DCF problem.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1540 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
JEFFREY PYLE: Why was media forced to pay DCF to do its job? (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Sep 2015
OP
salib
(2,116 posts)1. One more way to hide what should be open
It has become epidemic in this country.
lostnfound
(16,671 posts)2. Struggling newspapers and public are harmed, anything with real profit motive this is chicken feed
If big industries want government data, such fees aren't going to be a rounding error. Do-gooders and truth-tellers, on the other hand, are on limited budgets.